TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical treatments for older breast cancer patients
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence
AU - Lai, Hsuan Wen
AU - Chen, Yu An
AU - Tam, Ka Wai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Older patients with breast cancer are often underrepresented in clinical trials, leading to a lack of evidence-based guidelines for surgical treatment in this cohort. Consequently, synthesizing real-world data is crucial for determining the optimal surgical management of geriatric patients with breast cancer. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The review included clinical studies evaluating treatments in patients aged ≥65 years with breast cancer. Comparisons were made between primary surgical treatment and endocrine therapy alone, breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy versus mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy versus omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy, and surgery plus axillary lymph node dissection versus omission of axillary lymph node dissection. Results: A total of 44 studies were analyzed. Surgery significantly increased overall survival, breast cancer–specific survival, and recurrence-free survival compared with endocrine therapy alone. Pooled estimates revealed that mastectomy yielded significantly better prognoses than breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy in terms of both overall survival and breast cancer–specific survival. Omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection did not significantly reduce overall survival. Conclusions: For older patients with breast cancer, primary surgical treatment significantly enhances survival and regional control compared with endocrine therapy alone without compromising quality of life. Frail patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who are unwilling to undergo radiotherapy benefit from mastectomy, with no notable psychosocial decline compared with breast-conserving surgery alone. Sentinel lymph node biopsy omission does not increase recurrence rates or mortality, and avoiding axillary lymph node dissection may be viable for node-positive older patients due to its comparable survival outcomes.
AB - Background: Older patients with breast cancer are often underrepresented in clinical trials, leading to a lack of evidence-based guidelines for surgical treatment in this cohort. Consequently, synthesizing real-world data is crucial for determining the optimal surgical management of geriatric patients with breast cancer. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The review included clinical studies evaluating treatments in patients aged ≥65 years with breast cancer. Comparisons were made between primary surgical treatment and endocrine therapy alone, breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy versus mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy versus omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy, and surgery plus axillary lymph node dissection versus omission of axillary lymph node dissection. Results: A total of 44 studies were analyzed. Surgery significantly increased overall survival, breast cancer–specific survival, and recurrence-free survival compared with endocrine therapy alone. Pooled estimates revealed that mastectomy yielded significantly better prognoses than breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy in terms of both overall survival and breast cancer–specific survival. Omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection did not significantly reduce overall survival. Conclusions: For older patients with breast cancer, primary surgical treatment significantly enhances survival and regional control compared with endocrine therapy alone without compromising quality of life. Frail patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who are unwilling to undergo radiotherapy benefit from mastectomy, with no notable psychosocial decline compared with breast-conserving surgery alone. Sentinel lymph node biopsy omission does not increase recurrence rates or mortality, and avoiding axillary lymph node dissection may be viable for node-positive older patients due to its comparable survival outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205580677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205580677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.045
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.045
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205580677
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 176
SP - 1576
EP - 1590
JO - Surgery (United States)
JF - Surgery (United States)
IS - 6
ER -