TY - JOUR
T1 - Simultaneous stimulation in bilateral leg motor areas with intermittent theta burst stimulation to improve functional performance after stroke
T2 - a feasibility pilot study
AU - Lin, Li Fong
AU - Chang, Kwang Hwa
AU - Huang, Ying Zu
AU - Lai, Chien Hung
AU - Liou, Tsan Hon
AU - Lin, Yen Nung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) was widely used in stroke rehabilitation and was more efficient than repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in terms of inducing larger motor evoked potential and producing longer effects. To our knowledge, the outcomes are not available combining rehabilitation and iTBS for improving motor function of lower extremities in patients with stroke. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of intermittent theta burst stimulation aiming to stimulate bilateral leg motor cortex and promote functional improvements. DESIGN: A single blind, randomized controlled pilot study. SETTING: Rehabilitation ward. POPULATION: Twenty patients with chronic stroke finally enrolled for analyzed. METHODS: Participants were randomized into two groups to receive 10 sessions of iTBS group and sham group over a 5-week period. The iTBS was delivered over the midline of skull to stimulate bilateral leg motor cortex. The outcome measures included balance, mobility, and leg motor functions were measured before and after interventions. RESULTS: Within-group differences were significant in the Berg Balance Scale for both groups (Z=-2.442, P=0.015 in iTBS group; Z=-2.094, P=0.036 in sham group), in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (Z=-2.264, P=0.024) and Overall Stability Index of Biodex Balance System of iTBS group (Z=-2.124, P=0.034). However, no significant between-group differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: There was no powerful evidence to support the effectiveness of iTBS group better than sham control group. Some essential technical issues should be considered for future studies applying iTBS to stimulate bilateral leg motor cortex. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: iTBS combined with stroke rehabilitation are probably expected to be useful to promote brain plasticity and functional performance but some technical issues should be carefully considered.
AB - BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) was widely used in stroke rehabilitation and was more efficient than repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in terms of inducing larger motor evoked potential and producing longer effects. To our knowledge, the outcomes are not available combining rehabilitation and iTBS for improving motor function of lower extremities in patients with stroke. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of intermittent theta burst stimulation aiming to stimulate bilateral leg motor cortex and promote functional improvements. DESIGN: A single blind, randomized controlled pilot study. SETTING: Rehabilitation ward. POPULATION: Twenty patients with chronic stroke finally enrolled for analyzed. METHODS: Participants were randomized into two groups to receive 10 sessions of iTBS group and sham group over a 5-week period. The iTBS was delivered over the midline of skull to stimulate bilateral leg motor cortex. The outcome measures included balance, mobility, and leg motor functions were measured before and after interventions. RESULTS: Within-group differences were significant in the Berg Balance Scale for both groups (Z=-2.442, P=0.015 in iTBS group; Z=-2.094, P=0.036 in sham group), in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (Z=-2.264, P=0.024) and Overall Stability Index of Biodex Balance System of iTBS group (Z=-2.124, P=0.034). However, no significant between-group differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: There was no powerful evidence to support the effectiveness of iTBS group better than sham control group. Some essential technical issues should be considered for future studies applying iTBS to stimulate bilateral leg motor cortex. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: iTBS combined with stroke rehabilitation are probably expected to be useful to promote brain plasticity and functional performance but some technical issues should be carefully considered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065564481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065564481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05245-0
DO - 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05245-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 30156086
AN - SCOPUS:85065564481
SN - 1973-9087
VL - 55
SP - 162
EP - 168
JO - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
JF - European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
IS - 2
ER -