TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer through urine metabolomic signatures
T2 - A large-scale validated study
AU - Huang, Hsiang Po
AU - Chen, Chung Hsin
AU - Chang, Kai Hsiung
AU - Lee, Ming Shyue
AU - Lee, Cheng Fan
AU - Chao, Yen Hsiang
AU - Lu, Shih Yu
AU - Wu, Tzu Fan
AU - Liang, Sung Tzu
AU - Lin, Chih Yu
AU - Lin, Yuan Chi
AU - Liu, Shih Ping
AU - Lu, Yu Chuan
AU - Shun, Chia Tung
AU - Huang, William J.
AU - Lin, Tzu Ping
AU - Ku, Ming Hsuan
AU - Chung, Hsiao Jen
AU - Chang, Yen Hwa
AU - Liao, Chun Hou
AU - Yu, Chih Chin
AU - Chung, Shiu Dong
AU - Tsai, Yao Chou
AU - Wu, Chia Chang
AU - Chen, Kuan Chou
AU - Ho, Chen Hsun
AU - Hsiao, Pei Wen
AU - Pu, Yeong Shiau
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Purpose: Currently, there are no accurate markers for predicting potentially lethal prostate cancer (PC) before biopsy. This study aimed to develop urine tests to predict clinically significant PC (sPC) in men at risk. Methods: Urine samples from 928 men, namely, 660 PC patients and 268 benign subjects, were analyzed by gas chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrophotometry (GC/Q-TOF MS) metabolomic profiling to construct four predictive models. Model I discriminated between PC and benign cases. Models II, III, and GS, respectively, predicted sPC in those classified as having favorable intermediate risk or higher, unfavorable intermediate risk or higher (according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groupings), and a Gleason sum (GS) of ≥ 7. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Results: In Models I, II, III, and GS, the best AUCs (0.94, 0.85, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively; training cohort, N = 603) involved 26, 24, 26, and 22 metabolites, respectively. The addition of five clinical risk factors (serum prostate-specific antigen, patient age, previous negative biopsy, digital rectal examination, and family history) significantly improved the AUCs of the models (0.95, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.87, respectively). At 90% sensitivity, 48%, 47%, 50%, and 36% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided. These models were successfully validated against an independent validation cohort (N = 325). Decision curve analysis showed a significant clinical net benefit with each combined model at low threshold probabilities. Models II and III were more robust and clinically relevant than Model GS. Conclusion: This urine test, which combines urine metabolic markers and clinical factors, may be used to predict sPC and thereby inform the necessity of biopsy in men with an elevated PC risk.
AB - Purpose: Currently, there are no accurate markers for predicting potentially lethal prostate cancer (PC) before biopsy. This study aimed to develop urine tests to predict clinically significant PC (sPC) in men at risk. Methods: Urine samples from 928 men, namely, 660 PC patients and 268 benign subjects, were analyzed by gas chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrophotometry (GC/Q-TOF MS) metabolomic profiling to construct four predictive models. Model I discriminated between PC and benign cases. Models II, III, and GS, respectively, predicted sPC in those classified as having favorable intermediate risk or higher, unfavorable intermediate risk or higher (according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groupings), and a Gleason sum (GS) of ≥ 7. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Results: In Models I, II, III, and GS, the best AUCs (0.94, 0.85, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively; training cohort, N = 603) involved 26, 24, 26, and 22 metabolites, respectively. The addition of five clinical risk factors (serum prostate-specific antigen, patient age, previous negative biopsy, digital rectal examination, and family history) significantly improved the AUCs of the models (0.95, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.87, respectively). At 90% sensitivity, 48%, 47%, 50%, and 36% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided. These models were successfully validated against an independent validation cohort (N = 325). Decision curve analysis showed a significant clinical net benefit with each combined model at low threshold probabilities. Models II and III were more robust and clinically relevant than Model GS. Conclusion: This urine test, which combines urine metabolic markers and clinical factors, may be used to predict sPC and thereby inform the necessity of biopsy in men with an elevated PC risk.
KW - Active surveillance
KW - Aggressive
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Liquid biopsy
KW - Prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173830690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85173830690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12967-023-04424-9
DO - 10.1186/s12967-023-04424-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 37821919
AN - SCOPUS:85173830690
SN - 1479-5876
VL - 21
JO - Journal of Translational Medicine
JF - Journal of Translational Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 714
ER -