TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with complicated cholecystitis: A safety and feasibility study
AU - Lo, Hung-Chieh
AU - Wang, Yu-Chun
AU - Huang, Jui-Chien
AU - Hsu, Cheng-Hsiung
AU - Wu, Shih-Chi
AU - Hsieh, Chi-Hsun
N1 - 被引用次數:3
Export Date: 24 March 2016
CODEN: WJSUD
通訊地址: Lo, H.-C.; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan; 電子郵件: [email protected]
參考文獻: Eldar, S., Sabo, E., Nash, E., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Prospective trial (1997) World J Surg, 21, pp. 540-545. , doi:10.1007/PL00012283; Ponsky, J.L., Heniford, B.T., Gersin, K., Choledocholithiasis: Evolving intraoperative strategies (2000) Am Surg, 66, pp. 262-268; Davis, W.Z., Cotton, P.B., Arias, R., ERCP and sphincterotomy in the context of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Academic and community practice patterns and results (1997) Am J Gastroenterol, 92, pp. 597-601; Cotton, P.B., Lehman, G., Vennes, J., Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: An attempt at consensus (1991) Gastrointest Endosc, 37, pp. 383-393; Morino, M., Baracchi, F., Miglietta, C., Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones (2006) Ann Surg, 244, pp. 89-893. , discussion 893-886; Tanaka, M., Takahata, S., Konomi, H., Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones (1998) Gastrointest Endosc, 48, pp. 465-469; Topal, B., Vromman, K., Aerts, R., Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stones (2010) Surg Endosc, 24, pp. 413-416; Nathanson, L.K., O'Rourke, N.A., Martin, I.J., Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: A randomized trial (2005) Ann Surg, 242, pp. 188-192; Stoker, M.E., Leveillee, R.J., McCann Jr., J.C., Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (1991) J Laparoendosc Surg, 1, pp. 287-293; Petelin, J.B., Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (2003) Surg Endosc, 17, pp. 1705-1715; Wu, S.-C., Chen, F.-C., Lo, C.-J., Selective intraoperative cholangiography and single-stage management of common bile duct stone in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (2005) World J Surg, 29, pp. 1402-1408; Schrenk, P., Woisetschlager, R., Rieger, R., A diagnostic score to predict the difficulty of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy from preoperative variables (1998) Surg Endosc, 12, pp. 148-150; Hasson, H.M., A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy (1971) Am J Obstet Gynecol, 110, pp. 886-887; Dorman, J.P., Franklin Jr., M.E., Glass, J.L., Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy. An effective and efficient method of treatment of choledocholithiasis (1998) Surg Endosc, 12, pp. 926-928; Michel, J., Navarro, F., Montpeyroux, F., Treatment of common bile duct stones with laparoscopy. Retrospective multicenter study with 612 patients (2000) Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 24, pp. 404-408; Fan, S.T., Lai, E.C., Mok, F.P., Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy (1993) N Engl J Med, 328, pp. 228-232; Lai, E.C., Mok, F.P., Tan, E.S., Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis (1992) N Engl J Med, 326, pp. 1582-1586; Cuschieri, A., Lezoche, E., Morino, M., E.A.E.S. Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi (1999) Surg Endosc, 13, pp. 952-957; Suc, B., Escat, J., Cherqui, D., Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: A multicenter randomized trial (1998) French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg, 133, pp. 702-708; Rhodes, M., Sussman, L., Cohen, L., Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones (1998) Lancet, 351, pp. 159-161; Shamiyeh, A., Danis, J., Wayand, W., A 14-year analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Conversion-when and why? (2007) Surgical Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 17, pp. 271-276; Koo, K.P., Traverso, L.W., Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? (1996) Am J Surg, 171, pp. 495-499; Hunter, J.G., Soper, N.J., Laparoscopic management of bile duct stones (1992) Surg Clin North Am, 72, pp. 1077-1097; Tokumura, H., Umezawa, A., Cao, H., Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: Transcystic approach and choledochotomy (2002) J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg, 9, pp. 206-212; Bove, A., Bongarzoni, G., Palone, G., Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis (2009) Surg Endosc, 23, pp. 1470-1475; Tinoco, R., Tinoco, A., El-Kadre, L., Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (2008) Ann Surg, 247, pp. 674-679; Chiarugi, M., Galatioto, C., Lippolis, P.V., Simultaneous laparoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones associated with acute cholecystitis. Results of a prospective study (2004) Chir Endosc, 18, pp. 910-914; Cuschieri, A., Ductal stones: Pathology, clinical manifestations, laparoscopic extraction techniques, and complications (2000) Semin Laparosc Surg, 7, pp. 246-261; Turunen, M.T., Jarvinen, H.J., Hastbacka, J., Choledochoscopy versus postexploratory cholangiography in prevention of retained common duct stones (1984) Ann Chir Gynaecol, 73, pp. 249-252; Topal, B., Aerts, R., Penninckx, F., Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy (2007) Surg Endosc, 21, pp. 2317-2321; Martin, D.J., Vernon, D.R., Toouli, J., Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones (2006) Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp. CD003327; Alhamdani, A., Mahmud, S., Jameel, M., Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (2008) Surg Endosc, 22, pp. 2190-2195
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is nowadays a preferred one-stage treatment. However, the influence of complicated cholecystitis (CC) on LCBDE has rarely been addressed. In the present study we aimed to verify whether severe gallbladder inflammation would adversely affect the outcome of LCBDE. Material and methods From 2008 to 2011, all patients undergoing LC and LCBDE at China Medical University Hospital were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the severity of cholecystitis. Those with unstable hemodynamics and co-morbidities who were deemed unfit for general anesthesia were excluded. Patient demographics, surgical results, and outcome were compared between the groups. Results During the study period, 117 patients diagnosed with cholecystitis were found to have common bile duct (CBD) stones and underwent LC + LCBDE. Of these 117 patients, 87 had uncomplicated cholecystitis (UC) and the remaining 30 patients had CC. There was no demographic difference between the groups, but for patients with CC there were marginally longer operative times (190 vs. 223 min, p = 0.141), more blood loss (10 vs. 150 ml, p
AB - Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is nowadays a preferred one-stage treatment. However, the influence of complicated cholecystitis (CC) on LCBDE has rarely been addressed. In the present study we aimed to verify whether severe gallbladder inflammation would adversely affect the outcome of LCBDE. Material and methods From 2008 to 2011, all patients undergoing LC and LCBDE at China Medical University Hospital were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the severity of cholecystitis. Those with unstable hemodynamics and co-morbidities who were deemed unfit for general anesthesia were excluded. Patient demographics, surgical results, and outcome were compared between the groups. Results During the study period, 117 patients diagnosed with cholecystitis were found to have common bile duct (CBD) stones and underwent LC + LCBDE. Of these 117 patients, 87 had uncomplicated cholecystitis (UC) and the remaining 30 patients had CC. There was no demographic difference between the groups, but for patients with CC there were marginally longer operative times (190 vs. 223 min, p = 0.141), more blood loss (10 vs. 150 ml, p
KW - aged
KW - article
KW - cholecystectomy
KW - cholecystitis
KW - common bile duct
KW - feasibility study
KW - female
KW - human
KW - male
KW - retrospective study
KW - severity of illness index
KW - Aged
KW - Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
KW - Cholecystitis
KW - Common Bile Duct
KW - Feasibility Studies
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Severity of Illness Index
U2 - 10.1007/s00268-012-1696-8
DO - 10.1007/s00268-012-1696-8
M3 - Article
SN - 0364-2313
VL - 36
SP - 2455
EP - 2460
JO - World Journal of Surgery
JF - World Journal of Surgery
IS - 10
ER -