TY - JOUR
T1 - Intranasal lidocaine for acute migraine
T2 - A protocol for the systematic review of randomized clinical trials
AU - Chi, Pei Wen
AU - Hsieh, Kun Yi
AU - Tsai, Chien Wei
AU - Hsu, Chin Wang
AU - Bai, Chyi Huey
AU - Chen, Chiehfeng
AU - Hsu, Yuan Pin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 the Author(s).
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Intranasal lidocaine has been shown to be effective in treating patients with acute migraines; however, its efficacy is still controversial. The aim of our study is to assess the efficacy and safety of intranasal lidocaine compared with a placebo or an active comparator for the treatment of acute migraine. METHODS: We will use PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases to search for articles from their inceptions to November 2018. We will only include randomized controlled studies. Data were independently will be extracted by 2 reviewers. Data analysis and synthesis will be analyzed by the Revman 5.3 software. We will conduct the study in accordance with the guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols. RESULTS: This review will evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal lidocaine for acute migraine. The primary outcome is pain intensity measured by visual analogue, numerical rating scale, or verbal rating scale. Secondary outcomes are success rate, requirement of rescue medicine, relapse, and adverse events. CONCLUSION: The findings of this systematic review will summarize the latest evidence of intranasal lidocaine for acute migraine. The results will provide implications for clinical practice and further research.Prospero registration number: CRD42018116226.
AB - BACKGROUND: Intranasal lidocaine has been shown to be effective in treating patients with acute migraines; however, its efficacy is still controversial. The aim of our study is to assess the efficacy and safety of intranasal lidocaine compared with a placebo or an active comparator for the treatment of acute migraine. METHODS: We will use PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases to search for articles from their inceptions to November 2018. We will only include randomized controlled studies. Data were independently will be extracted by 2 reviewers. Data analysis and synthesis will be analyzed by the Revman 5.3 software. We will conduct the study in accordance with the guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols. RESULTS: This review will evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal lidocaine for acute migraine. The primary outcome is pain intensity measured by visual analogue, numerical rating scale, or verbal rating scale. Secondary outcomes are success rate, requirement of rescue medicine, relapse, and adverse events. CONCLUSION: The findings of this systematic review will summarize the latest evidence of intranasal lidocaine for acute migraine. The results will provide implications for clinical practice and further research.Prospero registration number: CRD42018116226.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066838107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066838107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MD.0000000000015699
DO - 10.1097/MD.0000000000015699
M3 - Article
C2 - 31096514
AN - SCOPUS:85066838107
SN - 0025-7974
VL - 98
SP - e15699
JO - Medicine
JF - Medicine
IS - 20
M1 - e15699
ER -