Indications for elective neck dissection in cT1N0M0 oral cavity cancer according to the AJCC eight edition: A nationwide study

Chih Yen Chien, Cheng Ping Wang, Li Yu Lee, Shu Ru Lee, Shu Hang Ng, Chung Jan Kang, Jin Ching Lin, Shyuang Der Terng, Chun Hung Hua, Tsung Ming Chen, Wen Cheng Chen, Yao Te Tsai, Chi Ying Tsai, Ying Hsia Chu, Chien Yu Lin, Kang Hsing Fan, Hung Ming Wang, Chia Hsun Hsieh, Chih Hua Yeh, Chih Hung LinChung Kan Tsao, Nai Ming Cheng, Tuan Jen Fang, Shiang Fu Huang, Li Ang Lee, Ku Hao Fang, Yu Chien Wang, Wan Ni Lin, Li Jen Hsin, Tzu Chen Yen, Yu Wen Wen, Chun Ta Liao

研究成果: 雜誌貢獻文章同行評審

2 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)


Objectives: According to the NCCN guidelines, there is weak evidence to support the use of elective neck dissection (END) in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). We sought to examine the indications for END in patients with cT1N0M0 OCSCC defined according to the AJCC Staging Manual, Eight Edition. Methods: Of the 3886 patients diagnosed with cT1N0M0 included in the study, 2065 underwent END and 1821 neck observation. Results: The 5-year outcomes for patients who received END versus neck observation before and after propensity score matching (n = 1406 each) were as follows: neck control, 96 %/90 % (before matching), p < 0.0001; 96 %/90 % (after matching), p < 0.0001; disease-specific survival (DSS), 93 %/92 % (before matching), p = 0.0227; 93 %/92 % (after matching), p = 0.1436. Multivariable analyses revealed that neck observation, depth of invasion (DOI) > 2.5 mm, and poor differentiation were independent risk factors for 5-year outcomes. Upon the application of a scoring system ranging from 0 (no risk factor) to 3 (presence of the three risk factors), the following 5-year rates were observed: neck control, 98 %/95 %/84 %/85 %; DSS, 96 %/93 %/88 %/85 %; and overall survival, 90 %/86 %/79 %/59 %, respectively (all p < 0.0001). The survival outcomes of patients with scores of 0 and 1 were similar. The occult metastasis rates in the entire study cohort, DOI > 2.5 mm, and poor differentiation were 6.8 %/9.2 %/17.1 %, respectively. Conclusion: Because all patients who received neck observation had a score of 1 or higher, END should be performed when a DOI > 2.5 mm or poorly differentiated tumors are present. Under these circumstances, 48.6 % (1888/3886) of cT1N0M0 patients may avoid END without compromising oncological outcomes.
期刊Oral Oncology
出版狀態已發佈 - 5月 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 口腔外科
  • 腫瘤科
  • 癌症研究


深入研究「Indications for elective neck dissection in cT1N0M0 oral cavity cancer according to the AJCC eight edition: A nationwide study」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。