TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of the use of anti-diabetic drugs on survival of diabetic dialysis patients
T2 - a 5-year retrospective cohort study in Taiwan
AU - Hsiao, Po Jen
AU - Wu, Kun Lin
AU - Chiu, Szu Han
AU - Chan, Jenq Shyong
AU - Lin, Yuh Feng
AU - Wu, Chung Ze
AU - Wu, Chia Chao
AU - Kao, Sen Yeong
AU - Fang, Te Chao
AU - Lin, Shih Hua
AU - Chen, Jin Shuen
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and associated complications are common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and can increase morbidity and mortality. A longitudinal 5-year observational study was conducted to investigate whether the use of anti-diabetic medications or not affected survival rates of diabetic dialysis patients. Methods: Using a data sample of a million patients from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Database, a retrospective cohort study surveyed patients with type 2 DM who began dialysis between 2002 and 2007. The study population was classified into groups using or not using anti-diabetic drugs. The group using anti-diabetic drugs was then categorized into 3 subgroups, including use of only oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs), only insulin, and OHAs-combined insulin groups. Subjects of these four groups were followed 5 years or to date of death. Three major areas were analyzed: (1) demographic data and medical history; (2) survival prognosis and causes of death; and (3) effects on survival prognosis of different classes of OHAs. Results: A total of 912 patients fitting inclusion criteria were enrolled and followed-up for 5 years or to date of death. A total 465 patients died, and those not using anti-diabetic drugs (67.34 %) had a higher mortality rate than those using anti-diabetic drugs (46.42 %). After the multivariate analysis, group of OHAs-combined insulin had the lowest risk of death (HR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.27–0.47), followed by OHAs alone (HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.38–0.63) and then insulin alone (HR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.51–0.88). To clarify four classes of OHAs (sulfonylurea, α-glucosidase inhibitors, meglitinide, and thiazolidinedione) are used in Taiwan for uremia patient with type 2 DM, and in our study, there were no significant differences in survival prognosis for the four drugs. Finally, the most common cause of death was infectious disease and there were no significant differences among the four groups. Conclusion: This 5-year observational study results suggested that diabetic dialysis patients with anti-diabetic drugs had a lower risk of death compared with those without anti-diabetic drugs. Despite insulin therapy, appropriate OHAs should play an important role in treating these patients.
AB - Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and associated complications are common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and can increase morbidity and mortality. A longitudinal 5-year observational study was conducted to investigate whether the use of anti-diabetic medications or not affected survival rates of diabetic dialysis patients. Methods: Using a data sample of a million patients from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Database, a retrospective cohort study surveyed patients with type 2 DM who began dialysis between 2002 and 2007. The study population was classified into groups using or not using anti-diabetic drugs. The group using anti-diabetic drugs was then categorized into 3 subgroups, including use of only oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs), only insulin, and OHAs-combined insulin groups. Subjects of these four groups were followed 5 years or to date of death. Three major areas were analyzed: (1) demographic data and medical history; (2) survival prognosis and causes of death; and (3) effects on survival prognosis of different classes of OHAs. Results: A total of 912 patients fitting inclusion criteria were enrolled and followed-up for 5 years or to date of death. A total 465 patients died, and those not using anti-diabetic drugs (67.34 %) had a higher mortality rate than those using anti-diabetic drugs (46.42 %). After the multivariate analysis, group of OHAs-combined insulin had the lowest risk of death (HR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.27–0.47), followed by OHAs alone (HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.38–0.63) and then insulin alone (HR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.51–0.88). To clarify four classes of OHAs (sulfonylurea, α-glucosidase inhibitors, meglitinide, and thiazolidinedione) are used in Taiwan for uremia patient with type 2 DM, and in our study, there were no significant differences in survival prognosis for the four drugs. Finally, the most common cause of death was infectious disease and there were no significant differences among the four groups. Conclusion: This 5-year observational study results suggested that diabetic dialysis patients with anti-diabetic drugs had a lower risk of death compared with those without anti-diabetic drugs. Despite insulin therapy, appropriate OHAs should play an important role in treating these patients.
KW - Anti-diabetic drugs
KW - Diabetes mellitus
KW - Dialysis
KW - Insulin
KW - Oral hypoglycemic agents
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986252252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986252252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10157-016-1330-4
DO - 10.1007/s10157-016-1330-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 27599981
AN - SCOPUS:84986252252
SN - 1342-1751
VL - 21
SP - 694
EP - 704
JO - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
JF - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
IS - 4
ER -