TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of autologous whole blood or serum therapy for chronic spontaneous urticaria
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Chang, Hua Ching
AU - Sung, Chih Wei
AU - Lin, Ming Hsiu
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Dr. Kocat?rk (Department of Dermatology, Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey) for providing original data from one report included in our meta-analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/11/17
Y1 - 2019/11/17
N2 - Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is chronic wheals without identifiable exogenous stimuli. Autologous whole blood (AWB) injection and autologous serum therapy (AST) are alternative therapies for CSU that induce tolerance to circulating histamine-releasing factors. Objective: We elucidated currently available evidence for the efficacy and safety of AWB therapy and AST for CSU. Methods: We systematically searched four databases for eligible studies to perform meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the efficacy of AST or AWB therapy, and the secondary outcome was improvement after intervention based on the autologous serum skin test (ASST) status of patients. Results: Eight clinical trials, including four randomized controlled trials and 529 CSU patients, were identified. AST was not more effective than the placebo treatment in alleviating CSU symptoms at the end of treatment (p =.161), and AWB injection was also not more effective in response rates than the placebo at the end of follow-up (p =.099). Furthermore, the efficacy of AST or AWB injection for CSU and the ASST status were not significantly related. No remarkable adverse events were recorded during therapy. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggested that AWB therapy and AST are not significantly more effective in alleviating CSU symptoms than the placebo treatment.
AB - Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is chronic wheals without identifiable exogenous stimuli. Autologous whole blood (AWB) injection and autologous serum therapy (AST) are alternative therapies for CSU that induce tolerance to circulating histamine-releasing factors. Objective: We elucidated currently available evidence for the efficacy and safety of AWB therapy and AST for CSU. Methods: We systematically searched four databases for eligible studies to perform meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the efficacy of AST or AWB therapy, and the secondary outcome was improvement after intervention based on the autologous serum skin test (ASST) status of patients. Results: Eight clinical trials, including four randomized controlled trials and 529 CSU patients, were identified. AST was not more effective than the placebo treatment in alleviating CSU symptoms at the end of treatment (p =.161), and AWB injection was also not more effective in response rates than the placebo at the end of follow-up (p =.099). Furthermore, the efficacy of AST or AWB injection for CSU and the ASST status were not significantly related. No remarkable adverse events were recorded during therapy. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggested that AWB therapy and AST are not significantly more effective in alleviating CSU symptoms than the placebo treatment.
KW - Autologous serum skin test
KW - autologous serum therapy
KW - autologous whole blood injection
KW - chronic spontaneous urticaria
KW - meta-analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068158576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068158576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09546634.2019.1572863
DO - 10.1080/09546634.2019.1572863
M3 - Article
C2 - 30661442
AN - SCOPUS:85068158576
SN - 0954-6634
VL - 30
SP - 818
EP - 825
JO - Journal of Dermatological Treatment
JF - Journal of Dermatological Treatment
IS - 8
ER -