摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of shared decision-making (SDM) with a patient decision aid (PtDA) on hemostasis device selection and reduction of decisional conflicts in patients undergoing transfemoral angiography. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing angiography were randomized to receive either a standard explanation or the process aid of PtDA for choosing hemostasis devices. The decisional conflict was assessed using the 4-item Sure of myself; Understand information; Risk-benefit ratio; Encouragement (SURE) scale. Differences in demographic variables, clinical variables, and final choice of hemostasis devices were compared via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: In total, 158 patients were included—80 in the PtDA group and 78 in the standard group. No difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of patient demographic and clinical variables. The PtDA group scored better on all questions of the SURE scale both individually and collaboratively (P
原文英語
頁(從 - 到)832-839
頁數8
期刊Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
34
發行號5
DOIs
出版狀態接受/付印 - 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 放射學、核子醫學和影像學
  • 心臟病學與心血管醫學

指紋

深入研究「Effects of Shared Decision-Making with a Patient Decision Aid for Postangiography Hemostasis Method Selection: A Randomized Controlled Trial」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此