摘要
Objective: The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine responses related to entrustment and feedback comments from an assessment tool. Design: Qualitative analyses using semi-structured interviews and analysis of narrative comments. Setting: Main hospital OR suite at a large academic medical center. Participants: faculty, and residents who work in the OR suite. Results: Seven of the 14 theoretical domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework were identified as influencing faculty decision on entrustment: knowledge, skills, intention, memory/attention/decision processes, environmental context, and resources, beliefs of capabilities, and reinforcement. The majority (651/1116 (58.4%)) of faculty comments were critical/modest praise and relevant, consistent across all 6 EPAs. The written in feedback comments for all 1,116 Web App EPA assessments yielded a total of 1,599 sub-competency specific responses. These responses were mapped to core competencies, and at least once to 13 of the 23 ACGME subcompetencies. Conclusions: Domains identified as influencing faculty decision on entrustment were knowledge, skills, intention, memory/attention/decision processes, environmental context, and resources, beliefs of capabilities, and reinforcement. Most narrative feedback comments were critical/modest praise and relevant, consistent across each of the EPAs.
| 原文 | 英語 |
|---|---|
| 頁(從 - 到) | 741-752 |
| 頁數 | 12 |
| 期刊 | Journal of Surgical Education |
| 卷 | 81 |
| 發行號 | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| 出版狀態 | 已發佈 - 5月 2024 |
UN SDG
此研究成果有助於以下永續發展目標
-
SDG 4 品質教育
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- 手術
- 教育
指紋
深入研究「Domains Influencing Faculty Decisions on the Level of Supervision Required for Anesthesiology EPAs with Analysis of Feedback Comments」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。引用此
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS