TY - JOUR
T1 - Cox Proportional Hazard Ratios Overestimate Survival Benefit of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
T2 - Cox-TEL Adjustment and Meta-Analyses of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Survival Benefit
AU - Lin, Emily Pei Ying
AU - Hsu, Chih Yuan
AU - Chiou, Jeng Fong
AU - Berry, Lynne
AU - Horn, Leora
AU - Bunn, Paul
AU - Yang, James Chih Hsin
AU - Yang, Pan Chyr
AU - Adjei, Alex A.
AU - Shyr, Yu
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (P30CA068485, U24CA163056, U24CA213274, P50CA236733, P50CA098131, U54CA163072), the Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan (MOST107-2314-B-002-231, MOST108-2314-B-030-014, MOST109-2314-B-038-150, MOST108-2314-B-002-197-MY2), the National Health Research Institute Taiwan (NHRI-EX109-10937BC, NHRI-EX110-10937BC, NHRI-EX111-10937BC), and the Taipei Medical University (TMU110-AE1-B13, DP5-111-21314-07, 110TMU-TMUH-02-5).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Introduction: Survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in lung cancer is not fully understood. Methods: PubMed-cataloged publications through February 14, 2022, were queried for randomized controlled trials of ICI in lung cancer, and identified publications were reviewed for inclusion. Reported Cox hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival were transformed to Cox-TEL HR for ICI short-term survivors (ST-HR) and difference in proportions for patients with long-term survival (LT-DP). Meta-analyses were performed using a frequentist random-effect model. Outcomes of interest were pooled overall survival Cox HR, ST-HR, and LT-DP in NSCLC, stratified by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) level (primary outcome) and ICI treatment line (secondary). Results: A total of nine publications representing eight clinical trials were selected for meta-analysis. Primary analysis yielded the following metrics for patients with PD-L1 expression less than 1%, more than or equal to 1%, and more than or equal to 50%, respectively: pooled Cox HR, 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62–0.82), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68–0.82), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54–0.70); pooled ST-HR, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.79–1.05), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82–0.94), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.60–0.83); and pooled LT-DP, 0.10 (95% CI: 0.00–0.20), 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06–0.12), and 0.11 (95% CI: 0.05–0.17). Results of secondary analysis revealed LT-DP of approximately 10% across treatment lines. Conclusions: This study reveals an approximately 10% long-term survival probability increment in ICI long-term survivors across PD-L1–positive subpopulations in both ICI treatment lines. Furthermore, ST-HR was consistently poorer than Cox HR. For patients with PD-L1 less than 1%, neither LT-DP nor ST-HR achieved statistical significance. The analysis provides greater insight into the treatment effect of ICI in published trials.
AB - Introduction: Survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in lung cancer is not fully understood. Methods: PubMed-cataloged publications through February 14, 2022, were queried for randomized controlled trials of ICI in lung cancer, and identified publications were reviewed for inclusion. Reported Cox hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival were transformed to Cox-TEL HR for ICI short-term survivors (ST-HR) and difference in proportions for patients with long-term survival (LT-DP). Meta-analyses were performed using a frequentist random-effect model. Outcomes of interest were pooled overall survival Cox HR, ST-HR, and LT-DP in NSCLC, stratified by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) level (primary outcome) and ICI treatment line (secondary). Results: A total of nine publications representing eight clinical trials were selected for meta-analysis. Primary analysis yielded the following metrics for patients with PD-L1 expression less than 1%, more than or equal to 1%, and more than or equal to 50%, respectively: pooled Cox HR, 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62–0.82), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68–0.82), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54–0.70); pooled ST-HR, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.79–1.05), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82–0.94), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.60–0.83); and pooled LT-DP, 0.10 (95% CI: 0.00–0.20), 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06–0.12), and 0.11 (95% CI: 0.05–0.17). Results of secondary analysis revealed LT-DP of approximately 10% across treatment lines. Conclusions: This study reveals an approximately 10% long-term survival probability increment in ICI long-term survivors across PD-L1–positive subpopulations in both ICI treatment lines. Furthermore, ST-HR was consistently poorer than Cox HR. For patients with PD-L1 less than 1%, neither LT-DP nor ST-HR achieved statistical significance. The analysis provides greater insight into the treatment effect of ICI in published trials.
KW - Cox HR
KW - Cox-TEL
KW - Immune checkpoint inhibitor
KW - Long-term survival
KW - PD-L1
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142285676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142285676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.08.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.08.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 36049656
AN - SCOPUS:85142285676
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 17
SP - 1365
EP - 1374
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 12
ER -