TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of oncological outcomes for hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy
T2 - results from the Taiwan Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer Collaboration Group
AU - Yu, Chih Chin
AU - Chen, Chung Hsin
AU - Hong, Jian Hua
AU - Ke, Hung Lung
AU - Li, Wei Ming
AU - Chung, Shiu Dong
AU - Wu, Wei Che
AU - Chen, Yung Tai
AU - Jiang, Yuan Hong
AU - Lin, Yu Hua
AU - Lin, Wei Yu
AU - Wu, Chia Chang
AU - Tsai, Yao Chou
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) has gradually become the new standard treatment for localized upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). With more blunt dissection and tactile sensation, hand-assisted LNU might shorten the operative time compared with the pure laparoscopic approach. However, whether the use of the hand-assisted or the pure laparoscopic approach has an effect on oncological outcomes remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively identified 629 patients with non-metastatic UTUC who underwent hand-assisted (n = 515) or pure LNU (n = 114) at 9 hospitals in Taiwan between 2004 and 2019. Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and bladder recurrence-free survival were compared between these two groups using inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) derived from the propensity scores for baseline covariate adjustment. Results: The median follow-up period was 32.9 and 28.7 months in the hand-assisted and the pure groups, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models showed that the laparoscopic approach (pure vs. hand-assisted) was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49–1.24, p = 0.304), cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51–1.51, p = 0.634), or extra-vesical recurrence (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.41–1.04, p = 0.071). However, the pure laparoscopic approach was significantly associated with lower intra-vescial recurrence (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43–0.96, p = 0.029) for patients who underwent LNU. Kaplan-Meier curves also revealed that the pure laparoscopic approach was associated with better bladder recurrence-free survival compared with the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach in both the original cohort and the IPTW-adjusted cohort (log-rank p = 0.042 and 0.027, respectively). Conclusions: The performance of hand-assisted or pure LNU does not significantly affect the all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, or extra-vesical recurrence for patients with non-metastatic UTUC. However, the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach could increase the risk of intra-vesical recurrence for patients who undergo LNU.
AB - Purpose: Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) has gradually become the new standard treatment for localized upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). With more blunt dissection and tactile sensation, hand-assisted LNU might shorten the operative time compared with the pure laparoscopic approach. However, whether the use of the hand-assisted or the pure laparoscopic approach has an effect on oncological outcomes remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively identified 629 patients with non-metastatic UTUC who underwent hand-assisted (n = 515) or pure LNU (n = 114) at 9 hospitals in Taiwan between 2004 and 2019. Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and bladder recurrence-free survival were compared between these two groups using inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) derived from the propensity scores for baseline covariate adjustment. Results: The median follow-up period was 32.9 and 28.7 months in the hand-assisted and the pure groups, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models showed that the laparoscopic approach (pure vs. hand-assisted) was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49–1.24, p = 0.304), cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51–1.51, p = 0.634), or extra-vesical recurrence (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.41–1.04, p = 0.071). However, the pure laparoscopic approach was significantly associated with lower intra-vescial recurrence (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43–0.96, p = 0.029) for patients who underwent LNU. Kaplan-Meier curves also revealed that the pure laparoscopic approach was associated with better bladder recurrence-free survival compared with the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach in both the original cohort and the IPTW-adjusted cohort (log-rank p = 0.042 and 0.027, respectively). Conclusions: The performance of hand-assisted or pure LNU does not significantly affect the all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, or extra-vesical recurrence for patients with non-metastatic UTUC. However, the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach could increase the risk of intra-vesical recurrence for patients who undergo LNU.
KW - Hand-assisted
KW - Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy
KW - Oncological outcomes
KW - Upper tract urothelial cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118238531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118238531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-021-08779-2
DO - 10.1007/s00464-021-08779-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118238531
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 36
SP - 4342
EP - 4348
JO - Surgical endoscopy
JF - Surgical endoscopy
IS - 6
ER -