TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Features and Outcomes of Primary Breast Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
T2 - A Matched-Pair Study
AU - Teng, Ling Chiao
AU - Liao, Yu Min
AU - Gau, Jyh Pyng
AU - Hsiao, Tzu Hung
AU - Chen, Tsung Chih
AU - Chen, Mei-Hui
AU - Yeh, Su Peng
AU - Teng, Chieh Lin Jerry
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: The influence of the breast as the primary site on the outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and further changes in therapeutic strategies remain unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes between primary breast and non-breast DLBCL and analyze the genetic profiles of some of the study cohorts using next-generation sequencing. Methods: This matched-pair study reviewed the medical records of 19 patients with stage I and II primary breast DLBCL diagnosed between January 2005 and December 2021 on the basis of the Wiseman and Liao criteria, and we used 1:4 propensity score matching to identify patients with non-breast DLBCL as the control group. The overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were the outcome measures. Results: Patients with primary breast and non-breast DLBCL had a 5-year PFS of 72.6% and 86.9%, respectively (P =.206). These 2 groups also had comparable 5-year OS (86.9% vs 87.8%; P =.772). The breast as the primary site was not associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.14; 95% CI: 0.66-6.96; P =.206) and OS (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.27-5.93; P =.772). Conclusion: Patients with primary breast DLBCL and those with non-breast DLBCL had comparable PFS and OS under rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or R-CHOP-like regimens. Further investigations of the mutation profile, its clinical impact, potential central nervous system relapse, and prognosis of primary breast DLBCL are required.
AB - Background: The influence of the breast as the primary site on the outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and further changes in therapeutic strategies remain unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes between primary breast and non-breast DLBCL and analyze the genetic profiles of some of the study cohorts using next-generation sequencing. Methods: This matched-pair study reviewed the medical records of 19 patients with stage I and II primary breast DLBCL diagnosed between January 2005 and December 2021 on the basis of the Wiseman and Liao criteria, and we used 1:4 propensity score matching to identify patients with non-breast DLBCL as the control group. The overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were the outcome measures. Results: Patients with primary breast and non-breast DLBCL had a 5-year PFS of 72.6% and 86.9%, respectively (P =.206). These 2 groups also had comparable 5-year OS (86.9% vs 87.8%; P =.772). The breast as the primary site was not associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.14; 95% CI: 0.66-6.96; P =.206) and OS (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.27-5.93; P =.772). Conclusion: Patients with primary breast DLBCL and those with non-breast DLBCL had comparable PFS and OS under rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or R-CHOP-like regimens. Further investigations of the mutation profile, its clinical impact, potential central nervous system relapse, and prognosis of primary breast DLBCL are required.
KW - breast
KW - DLBCL
KW - NGS
KW - OS
KW - PFS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175611588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85175611588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/11795549231203142
DO - 10.1177/11795549231203142
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175611588
SN - 1179-5549
VL - 17
JO - Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
JF - Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
ER -