TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical assessment for non-reversal stoma and stoma re-creation after reversal surgery for rectal cancer patients after sphincter-saving operation
AU - Kuo, Chih Yu
AU - Lin, Yen Kuang
AU - Wei, Po Li
AU - Chi-Yong Ngu, James
AU - Lee, Kuan Der
AU - Chen, Chi Long
AU - Huang, Yaoru
AU - Chen, Chia Che
AU - Kuo, Li Jen
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was financially supported by Taipei Medical University (TMU104-AE1-B35).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for permanent stoma (PS) in patients who underwent sphincter-saving operations for rectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 597 consecutive patients with rectal cancer from January 2012 to December 2020 at Taipei Medical University Hospital. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to analyze risk factors for PS. Results: After a mean follow-up of 47.3 months (range 7–114 months), 59 patients (15.1%) were alive with a PS, including 46 patients who did not undergo reversal surgery and 13 patients who underwent stoma re-creation after reversal surgery. The mean period between primary surgery and stoma reversal was 6.0 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for PS were local recurrence [odd ratio (OR), 25.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.428–147.761; p < 0.001], perirectal abscess [OR, 154.34; 95% CI, 15.806 - >999; p < 0.001], anastomosis site stenosis [OR, 187.081; 95% CI, 22.193 - >999; p < 0.001], perineural invasion [OR, 4.782; 95% CI, 1.22–18.736; p = 0.025], and operation time (min) [OR, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.002–1.014; p = 0.01]. Conclusions: Local recurrence, perirectal abscess, anastomosis site stenosis, perineural invasion, and operation time were independent risk factors for PS. Therefore, before a patient undergoes surgery for rectal cancer, surgeons should consider the possibility of the need for a PS, and patients should be informed before the operation that closure of the temporary stoma may not always be possible.
AB - Background: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for permanent stoma (PS) in patients who underwent sphincter-saving operations for rectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 597 consecutive patients with rectal cancer from January 2012 to December 2020 at Taipei Medical University Hospital. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to analyze risk factors for PS. Results: After a mean follow-up of 47.3 months (range 7–114 months), 59 patients (15.1%) were alive with a PS, including 46 patients who did not undergo reversal surgery and 13 patients who underwent stoma re-creation after reversal surgery. The mean period between primary surgery and stoma reversal was 6.0 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for PS were local recurrence [odd ratio (OR), 25.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.428–147.761; p < 0.001], perirectal abscess [OR, 154.34; 95% CI, 15.806 - >999; p < 0.001], anastomosis site stenosis [OR, 187.081; 95% CI, 22.193 - >999; p < 0.001], perineural invasion [OR, 4.782; 95% CI, 1.22–18.736; p = 0.025], and operation time (min) [OR, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.002–1.014; p = 0.01]. Conclusions: Local recurrence, perirectal abscess, anastomosis site stenosis, perineural invasion, and operation time were independent risk factors for PS. Therefore, before a patient undergoes surgery for rectal cancer, surgeons should consider the possibility of the need for a PS, and patients should be informed before the operation that closure of the temporary stoma may not always be possible.
KW - Permanent stoma
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Reversal surgery
KW - Sphincter saving
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139723004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139723004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.107
DO - 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.107
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85139723004
SN - 1015-9584
VL - 46
SP - 1944
EP - 1950
JO - Asian Journal of Surgery
JF - Asian Journal of Surgery
IS - 5
ER -