TY - JOUR
T1 - Choosing the ideal length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent according to body height
T2 - Study based on a chinese population
AU - Ho, Chen Hsun
AU - Huang, Kuo How
AU - Chen, Shyh Chyan
AU - Pu, Yeong Shiau
AU - Liu, Shih Ping
AU - Yu, Hong Jeng
PY - 2009/7/1
Y1 - 2009/7/1
N2 - Objective: We conducted this study to determine the ideal stent length according to body height, as data are limited. Patients and Methods: A total of 408 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy and stent insertion (22, 24 or 26 cm) were enrolled. The appropriateness of the stent length was determined according to the plain films and was further compared among patients with different body heights and stent lengths. Results: In patients <160 cm, the use of a 22-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 24- or 26-cm stent (86.5, 51.9 and 46.4%). In patients between 160 and 175 cm, a 22- or 24-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 26-cm stent (79.2, 66.7 and 46.3%), while the difference between the use of a 22- and 24-cm stent was not significant. In patients >175 cm, a 24- or 26-cm stent might be more appropriate. Conclusions: Body heights can predict the ideal stent length. Based on a Chinese population, a 22-cm stent length is more appropriate for those <175 cm. A longer, 24- or 26-cm stent may be suitable for those >175 cm.
AB - Objective: We conducted this study to determine the ideal stent length according to body height, as data are limited. Patients and Methods: A total of 408 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy and stent insertion (22, 24 or 26 cm) were enrolled. The appropriateness of the stent length was determined according to the plain films and was further compared among patients with different body heights and stent lengths. Results: In patients <160 cm, the use of a 22-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 24- or 26-cm stent (86.5, 51.9 and 46.4%). In patients between 160 and 175 cm, a 22- or 24-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 26-cm stent (79.2, 66.7 and 46.3%), while the difference between the use of a 22- and 24-cm stent was not significant. In patients >175 cm, a 24- or 26-cm stent might be more appropriate. Conclusions: Body heights can predict the ideal stent length. Based on a Chinese population, a 22-cm stent length is more appropriate for those <175 cm. A longer, 24- or 26-cm stent may be suitable for those >175 cm.
KW - Double-pigtail ureteral stent
KW - Stent length
KW - Ureteral obstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68549118963&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68549118963&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000224872
DO - 10.1159/000224872
M3 - Article
C2 - 19641363
AN - SCOPUS:68549118963
SN - 0042-1138
VL - 83
SP - 70
EP - 74
JO - Urologia Internationalis
JF - Urologia Internationalis
IS - 1
ER -