TY - JOUR
T1 - Cancer essential genes stratified lung adenocarcinoma patients with distinct survival outcomes and identified a subgroup from the terminal respiratory unit type with different proliferative signatures in multiple cohorts
AU - Ho, Kuo Hao
AU - Huang, Tzu Wen
AU - Liu, Ann Jeng
AU - Shih, Chwen Ming
AU - Chen, Ku Chung
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This study was sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (grant no. MOST 109‐2320‐B‐038‐014 to Ku‐Chung Chen), Taipei City Government (grant no. 11001‐62‐022 to Ann‐Jeng Liu), and Taipei City Hospital Ren‐Ai Branch (grant no. TPCH‐110‐07 to Ann‐Jeng Liu). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/4/28
Y1 - 2021/4/28
N2 - Background: Heterogeneous features of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are used to stratify patients into terminal respiratory unit (TRU), proximal‐proliferative (PP), and proximal‐inflamma-tory (PI) subtypes. A more‐accurate subtype classification would be helpful for future personalized medicine. However, these stratifications are based on genes with variant expression levels without considering their tumor‐promoting roles. We attempted to identify cancer essential genes for LUAD stratification and their clinical and biological differences. Methods: Essential genes in LUAD were identified using genome‐scale CRIPSR screening of RNA sequencing data from Project Achilles and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Patients were stratified using consensus clustering. Survival outcomes, genomic alterations, signaling activities, and immune profiles within clusters were in-vestigated using other independent cohorts. Findings: Thirty‐six genes were identified as essential to LUAD, and there were used for stratification. Essential gene‐classified clusters exhibited distinct survival rates and proliferation signatures across six cohorts. The cluster with the worst prognosis exhibited TP53 mutations, high E2F target activities, and high tumor mutation burdens, and har-bored tumors vulnerable to topoisomerase I and poly(ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors. TRU‐type patients could be divided into clinically and molecularly different subgroups based on these essential genes. Conclusions: Our study showed that essential genes to LUAD not only defined patients with different survival rates, but also refined preexisting subtypes.
AB - Background: Heterogeneous features of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are used to stratify patients into terminal respiratory unit (TRU), proximal‐proliferative (PP), and proximal‐inflamma-tory (PI) subtypes. A more‐accurate subtype classification would be helpful for future personalized medicine. However, these stratifications are based on genes with variant expression levels without considering their tumor‐promoting roles. We attempted to identify cancer essential genes for LUAD stratification and their clinical and biological differences. Methods: Essential genes in LUAD were identified using genome‐scale CRIPSR screening of RNA sequencing data from Project Achilles and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Patients were stratified using consensus clustering. Survival outcomes, genomic alterations, signaling activities, and immune profiles within clusters were in-vestigated using other independent cohorts. Findings: Thirty‐six genes were identified as essential to LUAD, and there were used for stratification. Essential gene‐classified clusters exhibited distinct survival rates and proliferation signatures across six cohorts. The cluster with the worst prognosis exhibited TP53 mutations, high E2F target activities, and high tumor mutation burdens, and har-bored tumors vulnerable to topoisomerase I and poly(ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors. TRU‐type patients could be divided into clinically and molecularly different subgroups based on these essential genes. Conclusions: Our study showed that essential genes to LUAD not only defined patients with different survival rates, but also refined preexisting subtypes.
KW - E2F
KW - Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)
KW - Terminal respiratory unit (TRU)
KW - TP53 mutation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104895813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104895813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers13092128
DO - 10.3390/cancers13092128
M3 - Article
C2 - 33924966
AN - SCOPUS:85104895813
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 13
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 9
M1 - 2128
ER -