TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomechanical comparison of four tibial fixation techniques for meniscal root sutures in posterior medial meniscus root repair
T2 - A porcine study
AU - Wu, Shen Han
AU - Yeh, Tsu Te
AU - Hsu, Wei Chun
AU - Wu, Alexander T.H.
AU - Li, Guoan
AU - Chen, Chih Hwa
AU - Lee, Chian Her
AU - Wu, Jia Lin
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by grants from the support by Taipei Medical University and National Taiwan University of Science and Technology through project no. 107-TMU-NTUST-107-08.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Objective: This study hypothesized that the suture anchor of tibial fixation method of PMMR repair technique is the main factor which reduce the gap formation or over displacement of tear site in initial healing, and then investigated the fixation stability of 4 different tibial fixations through cyclic and ultimate failure load testing of meniscal root sutures. Methods: Twenty-four porcine tibiae with intact medial meniscus roots were randomly assigned into 4 groups: transosseous suture, washer, suture anchor, or screw with washer. Each sample underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Displacement, maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation at failure load were recorded. Results: The maximum average load and displacement at failure for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 232.8 N and 12.16 mm; washer, 189.9 N and 21.5 mm; suture anchor, 140.6 N and 13.8 mm; and screw with washer, 167.9 N and 18.9 mm. The maximum stiffness values for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 19.5 ± 0.7 N/mm; washer, 21.5 ± 1.4 N/mm; suture anchor, 13.8 ± 0.7 N/mm; and screw with washer, 18.9 ± 3.9 N/mm. The mean elongation across the repairs for each of the repair groups after 1000 loading cycles was: transosseous suture, 3.74 ± 0.28 mm; washer, 3.04 ± 0.13 mm; suture anchor, 2.25 ± 0.33 mm; and screw with washer, 2.43 ± 0.19 mm. The mean elongation was significantly less with the suture anchor than with the other techniques (p < .05). Conclusion: Under physiological loading, our results indicate that a slower rehabilitation program with limited flexion and only partial weight bearing is advised when using a suture anchor because of the lower maximum load and stiffness. The translational potential of this article: Tibial fixation using a washer or a screw with a washer is an effective and cost-saving technique when an option is required with high stiffness and low displacement at failure.
AB - Objective: This study hypothesized that the suture anchor of tibial fixation method of PMMR repair technique is the main factor which reduce the gap formation or over displacement of tear site in initial healing, and then investigated the fixation stability of 4 different tibial fixations through cyclic and ultimate failure load testing of meniscal root sutures. Methods: Twenty-four porcine tibiae with intact medial meniscus roots were randomly assigned into 4 groups: transosseous suture, washer, suture anchor, or screw with washer. Each sample underwent cyclic loading followed by a load-to-failure test. Displacement, maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation at failure load were recorded. Results: The maximum average load and displacement at failure for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 232.8 N and 12.16 mm; washer, 189.9 N and 21.5 mm; suture anchor, 140.6 N and 13.8 mm; and screw with washer, 167.9 N and 18.9 mm. The maximum stiffness values for each of the repair groups were as follows: transosseous suture, 19.5 ± 0.7 N/mm; washer, 21.5 ± 1.4 N/mm; suture anchor, 13.8 ± 0.7 N/mm; and screw with washer, 18.9 ± 3.9 N/mm. The mean elongation across the repairs for each of the repair groups after 1000 loading cycles was: transosseous suture, 3.74 ± 0.28 mm; washer, 3.04 ± 0.13 mm; suture anchor, 2.25 ± 0.33 mm; and screw with washer, 2.43 ± 0.19 mm. The mean elongation was significantly less with the suture anchor than with the other techniques (p < .05). Conclusion: Under physiological loading, our results indicate that a slower rehabilitation program with limited flexion and only partial weight bearing is advised when using a suture anchor because of the lower maximum load and stiffness. The translational potential of this article: Tibial fixation using a washer or a screw with a washer is an effective and cost-saving technique when an option is required with high stiffness and low displacement at failure.
KW - Meniscus–suture interface
KW - Posterior medial meniscus root repair
KW - Transtibial pull-out fixation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084419578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084419578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084419578
SN - 2214-031X
VL - 24
SP - 144
EP - 149
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
ER -