TY - JOUR
T1 - A Scoping Review to Assess Adherence to and Clinical Outcomes of Wearable Devices in the Cancer Population
AU - Huang, Yaoru
AU - Upadhyay, Umashankar
AU - Dhar, Eshita
AU - Kuo, Li Jen
AU - Syed-Abdul, Shabbir
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Taipei Medical University and Taipei Medical University Hospital under a joint research grant (109TMU-TMUH-11). This Study is also partially funded by H2020, iHelp project under the research grant (GA: 101017441 and MOST, Taiwan: 110-2923-E038-001-MY3).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - The use of wearable devices (WDs) in healthcare monitoring and management has attracted increasing attention. A major problem is patients’ adherence and acceptance of WDs given that they are already experiencing a disease burden and treatment side effects. This scoping review explored the use of wrist-worn devices in the cancer population, with a special focus on adherence and clinical outcomes. Relevant articles focusing on the use of WDs in cancer care management were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase from 1 January 2017 to 3 March 2022. Studies were independently screened and relevant information was extracted. We identified 752 studies, of which 38 met our inclusion criteria. Studies focused on mixed, breast, colorectal, lung, gastric, urothelial, skin, liver, and blood cancers. Adherence to WDs varied from 60% to 100%. The highest adherence was reported in the 12-week studies. Most studies focused on physical activity, sleep analysis, and heart vital signs. Of the 10 studies that described patient-reported outcomes using questionnaires and personal interviews, 8 indicated a positive correlation between the patient-reported and wearable outcomes. The definitions of the outcome measures and adherence varied across the studies. A better understanding of the intervention standards in terms of the clinical outcomes could improve adherence to wearables.
AB - The use of wearable devices (WDs) in healthcare monitoring and management has attracted increasing attention. A major problem is patients’ adherence and acceptance of WDs given that they are already experiencing a disease burden and treatment side effects. This scoping review explored the use of wrist-worn devices in the cancer population, with a special focus on adherence and clinical outcomes. Relevant articles focusing on the use of WDs in cancer care management were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase from 1 January 2017 to 3 March 2022. Studies were independently screened and relevant information was extracted. We identified 752 studies, of which 38 met our inclusion criteria. Studies focused on mixed, breast, colorectal, lung, gastric, urothelial, skin, liver, and blood cancers. Adherence to WDs varied from 60% to 100%. The highest adherence was reported in the 12-week studies. Most studies focused on physical activity, sleep analysis, and heart vital signs. Of the 10 studies that described patient-reported outcomes using questionnaires and personal interviews, 8 indicated a positive correlation between the patient-reported and wearable outcomes. The definitions of the outcome measures and adherence varied across the studies. A better understanding of the intervention standards in terms of the clinical outcomes could improve adherence to wearables.
KW - cancer
KW - eHealth
KW - health monitoring
KW - wearable devices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138677483&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138677483&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers14184437
DO - 10.3390/cancers14184437
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85138677483
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 14
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 18
M1 - 4437
ER -