Walking is more effective than yoga at reducing sleep disturbance in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Mei Fen Tang
  • , Hsiao Yean Chiu
  • , Xinyi Xu
  • , Jojo Yan Kwok
  • , Denise Shuk Ting Cheung
  • , Chun Yuan Chen
  • , Chia Chin Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This review aimed to determine whether walking is more effective than yoga at improving sleep disturbance in cancer patients. A systematic search of randomized controlled trials was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Airiti Library, and other health-related databases. Twenty-five studies were identified with a total of 1918 participants. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index was the most commonly used outcome measurement tool, and moderate-intensity walking was the most frequently used intervention. The majority of the included subjects were breast cancer patients. Overall, walking significantly improved sleep disturbance compared to yoga (p = 0.01). Statistically significant moderators included adherence rate for walking (p < 0.001) and allocation concealment and outcome measurement tool for yoga (p = 0.04; p = 0.03). We concluded that walking is more effective than yoga in improving sleep disturbance in cancer patients. Thus, moderate-intensity walking is recommended for cancer patients with sleep disturbance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalSleep Medicine Reviews
Volume47
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2019

Keywords

  • Cancer patients
  • Exercise
  • PSQI
  • Sleep disturbance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Walking is more effective than yoga at reducing sleep disturbance in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this