Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Unique biochemical, cytotoxic, and antitumor activity of camptothecin and 4β-amino-4'-O-demethylepipodophyllotoxin conjugates

  • Jang Yang Chang
  • , Xin Guo
  • , Hong Xing Chen
  • , Zaoli Jiang
  • , Qin Fu
  • , Hui Kang Wang
  • , Kenneth F. Bastow
  • , Xiao Kang Zhu
  • , Jian Guan
  • , Kuo Hsiung Lee
  • , Yung Chi Cheng

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Two compounds having a camptothecin (CPT) analog conjugated to the 4β-amino-4'-O-demethylepipodophyllotoxin analog were evaluated for their biochemical and biological activities. W1 [camptothecin-(para)-4β-amino-4'-O-demethylepipodophyllotoxin] had no activity against topoisomerase II (TOP II), but inhibited topoisomerase I (TOP I) with an IC50 value 2-fold higher than CPT. W2 [camptothecin-(ortho)-4β-amino-4'-O-demethylepipodophyllotoxin] had inhibitory activity against TOP I and TOP II with IC50 values 1.5-fold higher than either CPT or etoposide (VP-16). Both conjugates had similar cytotoxicity against the KB cell line, although the protein-linked DNA breaks (PLDBs) generated by W2 in KB cells were about 4-fold more than those of W1. No cross-resistance with the two conjugates was seen in a VP-16-resistant KB subline, which showed down-regulation of TOP II and overexpression of the multiple drug resistance-associated protein, or in a vincristine-resistant KB subline with overexpression of gp-170/mdr-1. The CPT-resistant KB variant (KB CPT 100), which has a reduction in TOP I content and another mechanism that occurs post-PLDB formation, was partially resistant to both compounds. W1 was not affected by this post-PLDB resistance mechanism. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated that W1 and W2 had similar cell cycle effects on KB and KB CPT 100 cells, which accumulated in S-phase upon drug treatment. These results suggested that W1 and W2 exerted their cytotoxicity through TOP I. In CPT-resistant cells, however, an unidentified target also may be involved in the cytotoxic action of W1, and TOP II may still be a target for W2. In vivo, W1 was more effective against the growth of human prostate cancer cells in nude mice than VP-16, CPT, or W2. Given its antitumor activity and unique biochemical mechanism of action, W1 warrants exploration as an antitumor compound. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-508
Number of pages12
JournalBiochemical Pharmacology
Volume59
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Antitumor
  • Camptothecin
  • Conjugates
  • Topoisomerase
  • VP-16

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unique biochemical, cytotoxic, and antitumor activity of camptothecin and 4β-amino-4'-O-demethylepipodophyllotoxin conjugates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this