TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of gender on the communication skills assessment of medical students
AU - Huang, Chin Chou
AU - Huang, Chia Chang
AU - Yang, Ying Ying
AU - Lin, Shing Jong
AU - Chen, Jaw Wen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 European Federation of Internal Medicine.
PY - 2015/11
Y1 - 2015/11
N2 - Background Opinions on the interaction between the genders of standardized patients and examinees are controversial. Our study sought to determine the influence of gender on communication skills assessment in Eastern country. Methods We recruited year 5 medical students from a medical college in Taiwan. They were assigned to obtain informed consent from either male or female age-matched standardized patients. Their performance was rated by standardized checklist rating scores and global rating scores. Either male or female examiners rated their performance. Results A total of 253 medical students (166 male students and 87 female students) were recruited. The checklist rating scores for students interacting with male standardized patients were significantly lower than the scores for interactions with female standardized patients (male examiners, P = 0.006; female examiners, P = 0.001). For male students, the checklist rating scores were significantly lower for male standardized patients than for female standardized patients (male examiners, P = 0.006; female examiners, P = 0.008). For male standardized patients, male students had significantly lower checklist rating scores than female students when rated by male examiners (P = 0.044). The global rating scores were similar except when female students interacted with male and female SPs and when rated by female examiners (P = 0.004). Conclusion The gender of standardized patients influences communication skills assessment. In terms of checklist rating scores, female standardized patients seem preferable to minimize potential gender effects. In the best interest of students, global rating score may be preferable to checklist rating score, especially for male examinees.
AB - Background Opinions on the interaction between the genders of standardized patients and examinees are controversial. Our study sought to determine the influence of gender on communication skills assessment in Eastern country. Methods We recruited year 5 medical students from a medical college in Taiwan. They were assigned to obtain informed consent from either male or female age-matched standardized patients. Their performance was rated by standardized checklist rating scores and global rating scores. Either male or female examiners rated their performance. Results A total of 253 medical students (166 male students and 87 female students) were recruited. The checklist rating scores for students interacting with male standardized patients were significantly lower than the scores for interactions with female standardized patients (male examiners, P = 0.006; female examiners, P = 0.001). For male students, the checklist rating scores were significantly lower for male standardized patients than for female standardized patients (male examiners, P = 0.006; female examiners, P = 0.008). For male standardized patients, male students had significantly lower checklist rating scores than female students when rated by male examiners (P = 0.044). The global rating scores were similar except when female students interacted with male and female SPs and when rated by female examiners (P = 0.004). Conclusion The gender of standardized patients influences communication skills assessment. In terms of checklist rating scores, female standardized patients seem preferable to minimize potential gender effects. In the best interest of students, global rating score may be preferable to checklist rating score, especially for male examinees.
KW - Assessment
KW - Communication skills
KW - Gender
KW - Standardized patient
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947863904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947863904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.06.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.06.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 26160772
AN - SCOPUS:84947863904
SN - 0953-6205
VL - 26
SP - 670
EP - 674
JO - European Journal of Internal Medicine
JF - European Journal of Internal Medicine
IS - 9
ER -