Test–Retest Reliability and Random Measurement Error of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire in Older Adults With Subjective Memory Complaints

Hui Ling Yang, Kuei Ru Chou, Shih Chieh Lee, Po Han Lin, Hsin Yu Chiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To examine the psychometric properties of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) in older adults with subjective memory complaints. The three MMQ subscale (Satisfaction, Ability, and Strategy) was administered twice, with a 3-month interval. The test-retest reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The random measurement error was examined by calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC95). The test-retest reliabilities of the three MMQ subscales were generally acceptable. The SEM of the three MMQ subscales was higher than the acceptable criterion of 10%. Despite the influence of random measurement error, the change scores of the three MMQ subscales may represent true changes if they are larger than the MDC95 of 13.2 (Satisfaction), 18.4 (Ability), and 16.9 (Strategy). The MMQ appears to be a reliable measure for use in research settings, but may not yet be suitable for clinical use.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGerontology and Geriatric Medicine
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2023

Keywords

  • Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire
  • psychometric properties
  • random measurement error
  • subjective memory complaints
  • test-retest reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Test–Retest Reliability and Random Measurement Error of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire in Older Adults With Subjective Memory Complaints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this