TY - JOUR
T1 - SKYSCRAPER-02
T2 - Tiragolumab in Combination With Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer
AU - Rudin, Charles M.
AU - Liu, Stephen V.
AU - Soo, Ross A.
AU - Lu, Shun
AU - Hong, Min Hee
AU - Lee, Jong Seok
AU - Bryl, Maciej
AU - Dumoulin, Daphne W.
AU - Rittmeyer, Achim
AU - Chiu, Chao Hua
AU - Ozyilkan, Ozgur
AU - Johnson, Melissa
AU - Navarro, Alejandro
AU - Novello, Silvia
AU - Ozawa, Yuichi
AU - Tam, Sammi Hiu
AU - Patil, Namrata S.
AU - Wen, Xiaohui
AU - Huang, Meilin
AU - Hoang, Tien
AU - Meng, Raymond
AU - Reck, Martin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2024/1/20
Y1 - 2024/1/20
N2 - PURPOSE The phase III SKYSCRAPER-02 study determined whether the benefits of atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (CE) could be enhanced by the addition of tiragolumab in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We report final progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. METHODS Patients received tiragolumab 600 mg/placebo, plus atezolizumab 1,200 mg and CE (four cycles), then maintenance tiragolumab/placebo plus atezolizumab. Primary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and OS in patients without history/presence of brain metastases (primary analysis set [PAS]). Additional end points included PFS and OS in all patients regardless of brain metastases status (full analysis set [FAS]), response, and safety. RESULTS Four hundred ninety patients were randomly assigned (FAS): 243 to tiragolumab armand 247 to control arm. At the cutoff date (February 6, 2022;median duration of follow-up, 14.3 months [PAS] and 13.9 months [FAS]), final analysis of PFS in the PAS (n = 397) did not reach statistical significance (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; P =. 3504; median, 5.4 months tiragolumab v 5.6 months control). At the cutoff date (September 6, 2022; median duration of follow-up, 21.2 months [FAS]), median OS in the PAS at final OS analysis was 13.1 months in both arms (stratified HR, 1.14; P =. 2859). Median PFS and OS in the FAS were consistent with the PAS. The proportion of patients with immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) in the tiragolumab and control arms was 54.4% and 49.2%, respectively (grade 3/4: 7.9% and 7.7%). AEs leading to treatment withdrawal occurred in 8.4% and 9.3% of tiragolumab- and control-treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Tiragolumab did not provide additional benefit over atezolizumab and CE in untreated ES-SCLC. The combination was well tolerated with no new safety signals.
AB - PURPOSE The phase III SKYSCRAPER-02 study determined whether the benefits of atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (CE) could be enhanced by the addition of tiragolumab in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We report final progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. METHODS Patients received tiragolumab 600 mg/placebo, plus atezolizumab 1,200 mg and CE (four cycles), then maintenance tiragolumab/placebo plus atezolizumab. Primary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and OS in patients without history/presence of brain metastases (primary analysis set [PAS]). Additional end points included PFS and OS in all patients regardless of brain metastases status (full analysis set [FAS]), response, and safety. RESULTS Four hundred ninety patients were randomly assigned (FAS): 243 to tiragolumab armand 247 to control arm. At the cutoff date (February 6, 2022;median duration of follow-up, 14.3 months [PAS] and 13.9 months [FAS]), final analysis of PFS in the PAS (n = 397) did not reach statistical significance (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; P =. 3504; median, 5.4 months tiragolumab v 5.6 months control). At the cutoff date (September 6, 2022; median duration of follow-up, 21.2 months [FAS]), median OS in the PAS at final OS analysis was 13.1 months in both arms (stratified HR, 1.14; P =. 2859). Median PFS and OS in the FAS were consistent with the PAS. The proportion of patients with immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) in the tiragolumab and control arms was 54.4% and 49.2%, respectively (grade 3/4: 7.9% and 7.7%). AEs leading to treatment withdrawal occurred in 8.4% and 9.3% of tiragolumab- and control-treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Tiragolumab did not provide additional benefit over atezolizumab and CE in untreated ES-SCLC. The combination was well tolerated with no new safety signals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182955230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85182955230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.23.01363
DO - 10.1200/JCO.23.01363
M3 - Article
C2 - 37976444
AN - SCOPUS:85182955230
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 42
SP - 324
EP - 335
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -