TY - JOUR
T1 - Similarity modulates the face-capturing effect in change detection
AU - Yang, Cheng Ta
AU - Shih, Chia Hao
AU - Cheng, Mindos
AU - Yeh, Yei Yu
N1 - Funding Information:
Please address all correspondence to Yei-Yu Yeh, Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan 106. E-mail: [email protected] This research was supported by a grant from National Science Council to Y.-Y. Yeh (NSC 95-2413-H-002-003). We thank R. Palermo, Y.-M. Huang, H.-F. Chao, and Y.-C. Chiu for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank S.-H. Lin for his assistance on stimulus generation. Parts of the results were presented at the 13th annual meeting of OPAM, Toronto, Canada in 2005.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - We investigated whether similarity among faces could modulate the face-capturing effect in change detection. In Experiment 1, a singleton search task was used to demonstrate that a face stimulus captures attention and the odd-one-out hypothesis cannot account for the results. Searching for a face target was faster than searching for a nonface target no matter whether distractor-distractor similarity was low or high. The fast search, however, did not lead to a face-detection advantage in Experiment 2 when the pre- and postchange faces were highly similar. When participants in Experiment 3 had to divide their attention between two faces in stimulus displays for change detection, detection performance was worse than performance in detecting nonface changes. The face-capturing effect alone is insufficient to produce the face-detection advantage. Face processing is efficient but its effect on performance depends on the stimulus-task context.
AB - We investigated whether similarity among faces could modulate the face-capturing effect in change detection. In Experiment 1, a singleton search task was used to demonstrate that a face stimulus captures attention and the odd-one-out hypothesis cannot account for the results. Searching for a face target was faster than searching for a nonface target no matter whether distractor-distractor similarity was low or high. The fast search, however, did not lead to a face-detection advantage in Experiment 2 when the pre- and postchange faces were highly similar. When participants in Experiment 3 had to divide their attention between two faces in stimulus displays for change detection, detection performance was worse than performance in detecting nonface changes. The face-capturing effect alone is insufficient to produce the face-detection advantage. Face processing is efficient but its effect on performance depends on the stimulus-task context.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67849121877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67849121877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13506280701822991
DO - 10.1080/13506280701822991
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67849121877
SN - 1350-6285
VL - 17
SP - 484
EP - 499
JO - Visual Cognition
JF - Visual Cognition
IS - 4
ER -