TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses
AU - Moon, Woo Kyung
AU - Lo, Chung Ming
AU - Chang, Jung Min
AU - Huang, Chiun Sheng
AU - Chen, Jeon Hor
AU - Chang, Ruey Feng
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the National Science Council (NSC 101-2221-E-002-068-MY3), Ministry of Economic Affairs (100-EC-17-A-19-S1-164), and Ministry of Education (AE-00-00-06) of the Republic of China for the financial support. This study was also supported by a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A01185).
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - The accuracy of an ultrasound (US) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was evaluated for the classification of BI-RADS category 3, probably benign masses. The US database used in this study contained 69 breast masses (21 malignant and 48 benign masses) that at blinded retrospective interpretation were assigned to BI-RADS category 3 by at least one of five radiologists. For computer-aided analysis, multiple morphology (shape, orientation, margin, lesions boundary, and posterior acoustic features) and texture (echo patterns) features based on BI-RADS lexicon were implemented, and the binary logistic regression model was used for classification. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for statistical analysis. The area under the curve (Az) of morphology, texture, and combined features were 0.90, 0.75, and 0.95, respectively. The combined features achieved the best performance and were significantly better than using texture features only (0.95 vs. 0.75, p value = 0.0163). The cut-off point at the sensitivity of 86 % (18/21), 95 % (20/21), and 100 % (21/21) achieved the specificity of 90 % (43/48), 73 % (35/48), and 33 % (16/48), respectively. In conclusion, the proposed CAD system has the potential to be used in upgrading malignant masses misclassified as BI-RADS category 3 on US by the radiologists.
AB - The accuracy of an ultrasound (US) computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was evaluated for the classification of BI-RADS category 3, probably benign masses. The US database used in this study contained 69 breast masses (21 malignant and 48 benign masses) that at blinded retrospective interpretation were assigned to BI-RADS category 3 by at least one of five radiologists. For computer-aided analysis, multiple morphology (shape, orientation, margin, lesions boundary, and posterior acoustic features) and texture (echo patterns) features based on BI-RADS lexicon were implemented, and the binary logistic regression model was used for classification. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for statistical analysis. The area under the curve (Az) of morphology, texture, and combined features were 0.90, 0.75, and 0.95, respectively. The combined features achieved the best performance and were significantly better than using texture features only (0.95 vs. 0.75, p value = 0.0163). The cut-off point at the sensitivity of 86 % (18/21), 95 % (20/21), and 100 % (21/21) achieved the specificity of 90 % (43/48), 73 % (35/48), and 33 % (16/48), respectively. In conclusion, the proposed CAD system has the potential to be used in upgrading malignant masses misclassified as BI-RADS category 3 on US by the radiologists.
KW - BI-RADS
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Computer-assisted diagnosis
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888200859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888200859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8
DO - 10.1007/s10278-013-9593-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 23494603
AN - SCOPUS:84888200859
SN - 0897-1889
VL - 26
SP - 1091
EP - 1098
JO - Journal of Digital Imaging
JF - Journal of Digital Imaging
IS - 6
ER -