Abstract
The authors followed the guidelines of translation and pilot testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. The questionnaires were given to 50 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients under active treatment and 50 under follow-up at our institution from November 2000 to June 2001. A retest was conducted 2 weeks after the first interview/form completion for the follow-up group. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the two questionnaires were moderate to high in the follow-up group. Cronbach's α coefficients of all scales of the two questionnaires were ≥0.70 except that of cognitive functioning. Correlation of scales measuring similar dimensions of the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to high, while that of the QLQ-H&N35 and the QLQ-C30 and the SF-36 were moderate to low. Patients in the active treatment group had more serious acute problems due to disease and chemotherapy. Patients in the follow-up group had more serious chronic problems due to radiation therapy. We concluded that the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 had moderate to high test-retest reliability, high internal consistency in most scales, and could show the expected differences between patients in active treatment and follow-up group.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 93-98 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Quality of Life Research |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 1 2003 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- Quality of life
- The EORTC QLQ-C30
- The EORTC QLQ-H&N35
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health