TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic indicators and survival in patients with stage IIIB inflammatory breast carcinoma after dose-intense chemotherapy
AU - Somlo, George
AU - Frankel, Paul
AU - Chow, Warren
AU - Leong, Lucille
AU - Margolin, Kim
AU - Morgan, Robert
AU - Shibata, Stephen
AU - Chu, Peiguo
AU - Forman, Stephen
AU - Lim, Dean
AU - Twardowski, Przemyslaw
AU - Weitzel, Jeffrey
AU - Alvarnas, Joseph
AU - Kogut, Neil
AU - Schriber, Jeffrey
AU - Fermin, Eleanor
AU - Yen, Yun
AU - Damon, Lloyd
AU - Doroshow, James H.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Purpose: To improve treatment outcome for patients presenting with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), we have sequentially developed and tested single and tandem dose-intense chemotherapy regimens (DICT). Tumor- and treatment-related factors were analyzed to generate a prognostic model. Patients and Methods: Between May 1989 and April 2002, 120 patients received conventional-dose chemotherapy, surgery, and sequentially developed single- or tandem-cycle DICT. Disease- and treatment-specific features were subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis to correlate with outcome. Results: At a median follow-up of 61 months (range, 21 to 161 months), estimated 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 44% (95% CI, 34% to 53%) and 64% (95% CI, 55% to 73%), respectively. In an age-adjusted multivariate analysis, RFS was better in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumors (P = .002), for patients with fewer than four involved axillary nodes before DICT (P = .01), and in patients treated with radiation therapy (P = .001) and tandem DICT (P = .049). OS was improved in patients with ER/PR-positive tumors (P = .002), in those with fewer than four involved axillary nodes before DICT (P = .03), and in patients treated with radiation therapy (P = .002). Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests that either single or tandem DICT can be administered safely and may benefit selected patients with stage IIIB IBC. Those with receptor-negative IBC and with four or more involved axillary nodes before DICT need improved neoadjuvant and postadjuvant intensification therapy. A prospective randomized trial of single versus tandem DICT would be required to confirm the potential benefit of tandem DICT in the setting of IBC.
AB - Purpose: To improve treatment outcome for patients presenting with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), we have sequentially developed and tested single and tandem dose-intense chemotherapy regimens (DICT). Tumor- and treatment-related factors were analyzed to generate a prognostic model. Patients and Methods: Between May 1989 and April 2002, 120 patients received conventional-dose chemotherapy, surgery, and sequentially developed single- or tandem-cycle DICT. Disease- and treatment-specific features were subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis to correlate with outcome. Results: At a median follow-up of 61 months (range, 21 to 161 months), estimated 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 44% (95% CI, 34% to 53%) and 64% (95% CI, 55% to 73%), respectively. In an age-adjusted multivariate analysis, RFS was better in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumors (P = .002), for patients with fewer than four involved axillary nodes before DICT (P = .01), and in patients treated with radiation therapy (P = .001) and tandem DICT (P = .049). OS was improved in patients with ER/PR-positive tumors (P = .002), in those with fewer than four involved axillary nodes before DICT (P = .03), and in patients treated with radiation therapy (P = .002). Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests that either single or tandem DICT can be administered safely and may benefit selected patients with stage IIIB IBC. Those with receptor-negative IBC and with four or more involved axillary nodes before DICT need improved neoadjuvant and postadjuvant intensification therapy. A prospective randomized trial of single versus tandem DICT would be required to confirm the potential benefit of tandem DICT in the setting of IBC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042697186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042697186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.147
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.147
M3 - Article
C2 - 15143076
AN - SCOPUS:3042697186
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 22
SP - 1839
EP - 1848
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 10
ER -