TY - JOUR
T1 - Preconsultation use of analgesics on adults presenting to the emergency department with acute appendicitis
AU - Chong, C. F.
AU - Wang, T. L.
AU - Chen, C. C.
AU - Ma, H. P.
AU - Chang, H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 31700661 (to Y.-J. H.) and 31270792 (to D.-F. L.), Ministry of Science and Technology of the People?s Republic of China Grants 2013CB911501 (to D.-F. L.) and 2017YFA0504000 (to D.-C. W.), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant XDB08020202 (to D.-C. W.), and the program Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant 2014079 (to D.-F. L.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 31700661 (to Y.-J. H.) and 31270792 (to D.-F. L.), Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China Grants 2013CB911501 (to D.-F. L.) and 2017YFA0504000 (to D.-C. W.), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant XDB08020202 (to D.-C. W.), and the program Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant 2014079 (to D.-F. L.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
PY - 2004/1
Y1 - 2004/1
N2 - Objective: 279 cases of appendicitis were reviewed and compared for the difference between those patients who received pain medication before consulting a surgeon and those who were not treated with analgesics. Methods: All patients aged 15 years and older who underwent appendicectomy for appendicitis between 1 July 2001 and 30 June 2002 were divided into group 1 (those who received preconsultaion use of analgesics) and group 2 (those who were not treated with analgesics). The following measures were compared: age, sex, symptom duration, initial vital signs, white blood cell counts, frequency of imaging studies, time to operative intervention, and operative findings. Continuous and categorical variables were analysed using t and χ2 tests, respectively. Results: A total of 279 patients were included for analysis. Patient details (age, sex, symptom duration) of the two study groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 with respect to vital signs (systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature), white blood cell counts, and frequency of imaging studies (ultrasound, computed tomography). There was no significant difference in the rate of perforated appendicitis between the two study groups although a shorter median time to operative intervention has been found in the group who received analegesia. Conclusion: The preconsultation use of analgesics in ED patients with a final diagnosis of appendicitis is not associated with a longer delay to operative intervention and is not associated with an increased rate of perforated appendicitis.
AB - Objective: 279 cases of appendicitis were reviewed and compared for the difference between those patients who received pain medication before consulting a surgeon and those who were not treated with analgesics. Methods: All patients aged 15 years and older who underwent appendicectomy for appendicitis between 1 July 2001 and 30 June 2002 were divided into group 1 (those who received preconsultaion use of analgesics) and group 2 (those who were not treated with analgesics). The following measures were compared: age, sex, symptom duration, initial vital signs, white blood cell counts, frequency of imaging studies, time to operative intervention, and operative findings. Continuous and categorical variables were analysed using t and χ2 tests, respectively. Results: A total of 279 patients were included for analysis. Patient details (age, sex, symptom duration) of the two study groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 with respect to vital signs (systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature), white blood cell counts, and frequency of imaging studies (ultrasound, computed tomography). There was no significant difference in the rate of perforated appendicitis between the two study groups although a shorter median time to operative intervention has been found in the group who received analegesia. Conclusion: The preconsultation use of analgesics in ED patients with a final diagnosis of appendicitis is not associated with a longer delay to operative intervention and is not associated with an increased rate of perforated appendicitis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0842308056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0842308056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/emj.2003.004853
DO - 10.1136/emj.2003.004853
M3 - Article
C2 - 14734373
AN - SCOPUS:0842308056
SN - 1472-0205
VL - 21
SP - 41
EP - 43
JO - Emergency Medicine Journal
JF - Emergency Medicine Journal
IS - 1
ER -