Phase IB trial of ixabepilone and vorinostat in metastatic breast cancer

Thehang Luu, Kyu pyo Kim, Suzette Blanchard, Bean Anyang, Arti Hurria, Lixin Yang, Jan H. Beumer, George Somlo, Yun Yen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: VOR, an HDAC inhibitor, induces acetylation of tubulin, and decreases resistance by attenuating downstream activation of AKT, c-Raf and HER-2. Patients (pts) with MBC treated with VOR had a TTP of 8.5 months (range 4-14) and stable disease in 29% (Luu et al., 2008). Our preclinical data showed synergistic effect of IXA and VOR in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7. Methods: The primary aims were to: 1) define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose limiting toxicities (DLT), and 2) describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of 2 schedules of VOR and IXA. Secondary aims were to describe: 1) response rate (RR) and 2) clinical benefit rate (CBR). The study included: 1) pts with MBC; 2) ECOG PS 0-2; 3) adequate marrow and organ functions; 4) no prior IXA or VOR; and 5) <grade (gr) 1 neuropathy. Stable brain metastasis were allowed. Pts were randomized to schedule A: VOR (QDx14) + IXA (D2) Q21D; or B: VOR (D1-7 and 15-21) + IXA (D2, 9, 16) Q28D. A modified toxicity probability interval design (target toxicity rate= 0.2 and equivalence range +/- 0.05) (Ji et al, 2010) determined dose escalation guidelines. PK were assessed with LC-MS/MS assays. Results: Among 37 pts randomized, 36 were evaluable [median age (55 yrs); median prior chemotherapy regimens (3); ER and/or PR + (64%); HER2 + (19%)]. In cohort A, 16 pts were treated (1 inevaluable). The MTD was: VOR 300mg (QDx14) + IXA (32mg/m2 D2) Q21D (dose level 1). DLT was experienced by 27% (4/15) pts [gr 4 neutropenia, gr 3 fatigue/AST, hyponatremia and allergic reaction to IXA]. In cohort B, 21 pts were treated (dose level 1, n=15; dose level 2, n=6). The MTD was VOR 300mg QD (D1-7 and 15-21) + IXA 16mg/m2 (D2, 9, 16) Q28D (dose level 1), no DLTs were observed. Dose level 2 was closed with 50% (3/6) of pts experiencing DLTs [gr 3 neutropenia, hypertension, and hypokalemia]. Median cycles treated (cohort A: 6, cohort B: 4). Response in cohort A and B respectively was: 1 CR, 2 PR, 7 SD (RR: 20%, CBR: 67%) and 1 CR, 4 PR, 9 SD (RR: 33%, CBR: 93%). VOR and IXA PK were not influenced by the presence of the other drug, clearance values= 220 L/h and 20 L/h/m2, respectively. Conclusions: We established the MTD of VOR and IXA in pts with MBC. The combination demonstrated clinical activity in these heavily pretreated pts. Further studies are recommended.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)469-478
Number of pages10
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume167
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

Keywords

  • Histone deacetylation inhibitors (HDACIs)
  • Ixabepilone
  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • Phase IB clinical trial
  • Vorinostat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase IB trial of ixabepilone and vorinostat in metastatic breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this