TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of an emergency department intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan
T2 - An observational study
AU - Tseng, Jo Chi
AU - Li, Chih Huang
AU - Chen, Kuan Fu
AU - Chan, Yi Ling
AU - Chang, Shy Shin
AU - Wang, Feng Lin
AU - Chiu, Te Fa
AU - Chen, Jih Chang
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Purpose: The boarding of critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED) could reduce quality of care and increase mortality. An ED intensive care unit (ICU) was set up in a 3715-bed medical center to facilitate timely delivery of critical care. This study reports comparative outcomes of EDICU patients with specialty ICU patients. Materials and methods: Medical records of adult nontrauma ED patients admitted to nonsurgical ICUs (EDICU, medical, cardiac, alimentary, and neurological units) between January 2007 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The respective number of admissions, bed turnover rate, and length of stay were compared. Cox regression models were also applied to compare inhospital mortality risks among these patients. Results: With only 13% (14/108) of all ICU beds, EDICU admitted 36% (3711/10. 449) of patients. Emergency department ICU patients had an unfavorable adjusted hazard ratio for inhospital mortality compared with medical ICU and cardiac ICU patients, but after excluding patients with an ICU length of stay of 2. days or less, the difference in hazard ratio became nonsignificant. Conclusions: Emergency department ICU has admitted a disproportionately higher proportion of patients without sacrificing quality of care. Specialty care could be secured through direct communication between EDICU and specialty physicians and forming close collaboration between departments and ICUs.
AB - Purpose: The boarding of critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED) could reduce quality of care and increase mortality. An ED intensive care unit (ICU) was set up in a 3715-bed medical center to facilitate timely delivery of critical care. This study reports comparative outcomes of EDICU patients with specialty ICU patients. Materials and methods: Medical records of adult nontrauma ED patients admitted to nonsurgical ICUs (EDICU, medical, cardiac, alimentary, and neurological units) between January 2007 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The respective number of admissions, bed turnover rate, and length of stay were compared. Cox regression models were also applied to compare inhospital mortality risks among these patients. Results: With only 13% (14/108) of all ICU beds, EDICU admitted 36% (3711/10. 449) of patients. Emergency department ICU patients had an unfavorable adjusted hazard ratio for inhospital mortality compared with medical ICU and cardiac ICU patients, but after excluding patients with an ICU length of stay of 2. days or less, the difference in hazard ratio became nonsignificant. Conclusions: Emergency department ICU has admitted a disproportionately higher proportion of patients without sacrificing quality of care. Specialty care could be secured through direct communication between EDICU and specialty physicians and forming close collaboration between departments and ICUs.
KW - Boarding
KW - Critically ill patients
KW - Emergency department
KW - Hazard ratio
KW - In-hospital mortality
KW - Intensive care unit
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928585392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928585392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 25660907
AN - SCOPUS:84928585392
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 30
SP - 444
EP - 448
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
IS - 3
ER -