Optimizing Survival of Patients With Marginally Operable Stage IIIA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Surgery

Kai Lin Yang, Yih Chen Chang, Hui Ling Ko, Mau Shin Chi, Hsin Ell Wang, Pei Sung Hsu, Chen Chun Lin, Diana Yu Wung Yeh, Shang Jyh Kao, Jiunn Song Jiang, Kwan Hwa Chi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The management of marginally operable stage IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer is controversial. We established a phased concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) protocol offering neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery or, for reassessed inoperable patients, maintenance chemotherapy and split-course CCRT boost. Survival of the patients receiving neoadjuvant CCRT and surgery was optimized. Survival of the reassessed inoperable patients receiving split-course CCRT was acceptable. Background For marginally operable stage IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgery might not be done as planned after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for reasons (unresectable or medically inoperable conditions, or patient refusal). This study aims to investigate the outcomes of a phased CCRT protocol established to maximize the operability of marginally operable stage IIIA NSCLC and to care for reassessed inoperable patients, in comparison with continuous-course definitive CCRT. Materials and Methods Forty-seven patients with marginally operable stage IIIA NSCLC receiving CCRT were included. Twenty-eight patients were treated with our phased CCRT protocol, including neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery (group A, n = 16) or, for reassessed inoperable patients, maintenance chemotherapy and split-course CCRT boost (group B, n = 12). The other 19 were treated with continuous-course definitive CCRT (group C). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results Among all, median OS and PFS were 35.6 and 12.8 months, respectively (median follow-up, 22.3 months). The median OS of group A (not reached) was better than that of group B (34.4 months) and group C (15.2 months) (P = .009). On multivariate analysis, performance status 0 to 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.026; P < .001), adenocarcinoma (HR, 0.156; P = .003), and group A (HR, 0.199; P = .033) were independent prognostic factors. The OS of group B (HR, 0.450; 95% confidence interval, 0.118-1.717; P = .243) was not statistically different from that of group C. Conclusions For marginally operable stage IIIA NSCLC, our phased CCRT strategy may optimize survival by maximizing operability and maintain an acceptable survival for reassessed inoperable patients by split-course CCRT boost following maintenance chemotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)550-557
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Lung Cancer
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Marginally operable
  • Non–small cell lung cancer
  • Stage IIIA
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing Survival of Patients With Marginally Operable Stage IIIA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this