TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing Survival of Patients With Marginally Operable Stage IIIA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Surgery
AU - Yang, Kai Lin
AU - Chang, Yih Chen
AU - Ko, Hui Ling
AU - Chi, Mau Shin
AU - Wang, Hsin Ell
AU - Hsu, Pei Sung
AU - Lin, Chen Chun
AU - Yeh, Diana Yu Wung
AU - Kao, Shang Jyh
AU - Jiang, Jiunn Song
AU - Chi, Kwan Hwa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - The management of marginally operable stage IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer is controversial. We established a phased concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) protocol offering neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery or, for reassessed inoperable patients, maintenance chemotherapy and split-course CCRT boost. Survival of the patients receiving neoadjuvant CCRT and surgery was optimized. Survival of the reassessed inoperable patients receiving split-course CCRT was acceptable. Background For marginally operable stage IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgery might not be done as planned after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for reasons (unresectable or medically inoperable conditions, or patient refusal). This study aims to investigate the outcomes of a phased CCRT protocol established to maximize the operability of marginally operable stage IIIA NSCLC and to care for reassessed inoperable patients, in comparison with continuous-course definitive CCRT. Materials and Methods Forty-seven patients with marginally operable stage IIIA NSCLC receiving CCRT were included. Twenty-eight patients were treated with our phased CCRT protocol, including neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery (group A, n = 16) or, for reassessed inoperable patients, maintenance chemotherapy and split-course CCRT boost (group B, n = 12). The other 19 were treated with continuous-course definitive CCRT (group C). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results Among all, median OS and PFS were 35.6 and 12.8 months, respectively (median follow-up, 22.3 months). The median OS of group A (not reached) was better than that of group B (34.4 months) and group C (15.2 months) (P = .009). On multivariate analysis, performance status 0 to 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.026; P < .001), adenocarcinoma (HR, 0.156; P = .003), and group A (HR, 0.199; P = .033) were independent prognostic factors. The OS of group B (HR, 0.450; 95% confidence interval, 0.118-1.717; P = .243) was not statistically different from that of group C. Conclusions For marginally operable stage IIIA NSCLC, our phased CCRT strategy may optimize survival by maximizing operability and maintain an acceptable survival for reassessed inoperable patients by split-course CCRT boost following maintenance chemotherapy.
AB - The management of marginally operable stage IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer is controversial. We established a phased concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) protocol offering neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery or, for reassessed inoperable patients, maintenance chemotherapy and split-course CCRT boost. Survival of the patients receiving neoadjuvant CCRT and surgery was optimized. Survival of the reassessed inoperable patients receiving split-course CCRT was acceptable. Background For marginally operable stage IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgery might not be done as planned after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for reasons (unresectable or medically inoperable conditions, or patient refusal). This study aims to investigate the outcomes of a phased CCRT protocol established to maximize the operability of marginally operable stage IIIA NSCLC and to care for reassessed inoperable patients, in comparison with continuous-course definitive CCRT. Materials and Methods Forty-seven patients with marginally operable stage IIIA NSCLC receiving CCRT were included. Twenty-eight patients were treated with our phased CCRT protocol, including neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery (group A, n = 16) or, for reassessed inoperable patients, maintenance chemotherapy and split-course CCRT boost (group B, n = 12). The other 19 were treated with continuous-course definitive CCRT (group C). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results Among all, median OS and PFS were 35.6 and 12.8 months, respectively (median follow-up, 22.3 months). The median OS of group A (not reached) was better than that of group B (34.4 months) and group C (15.2 months) (P = .009). On multivariate analysis, performance status 0 to 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.026; P < .001), adenocarcinoma (HR, 0.156; P = .003), and group A (HR, 0.199; P = .033) were independent prognostic factors. The OS of group B (HR, 0.450; 95% confidence interval, 0.118-1.717; P = .243) was not statistically different from that of group C. Conclusions For marginally operable stage IIIA NSCLC, our phased CCRT strategy may optimize survival by maximizing operability and maintain an acceptable survival for reassessed inoperable patients by split-course CCRT boost following maintenance chemotherapy.
KW - Chemoradiotherapy
KW - Marginally operable
KW - Non–small cell lung cancer
KW - Stage IIIA
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994525970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994525970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.05.013
DO - 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.05.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 27378175
AN - SCOPUS:84994525970
SN - 1525-7304
VL - 17
SP - 550
EP - 557
JO - Clinical Lung Cancer
JF - Clinical Lung Cancer
IS - 6
ER -