TY - JOUR
T1 - Mosapride as an adjunct to lansoprazole for symptom relief of reflux oesophagitis
AU - Hsu, Yao Chun
AU - Yang, Tzeng Huey
AU - Hsu, Wei Lun
AU - Wu, Huei Tang
AU - Cheng, Yang Chih
AU - Chiang, Ming Feng
AU - Wang, Chaur Shine
AU - Lin, Hwai Jeng
PY - 2010/8
Y1 - 2010/8
N2 - AIMS To investigate if mosapride, a prokinetic agent, was an effective adjunct to acid suppression in improving the symptoms of reflux oesophagitis. METHODS Patients (n = 96) with reflux oesophagitis were randomly assigned to either mosapride (5 mg three times daily) or placebo for 4 weeks. Symptom severity was assessed by a validated questionnaire at enrolment, 4 and 8 weeks after medication. The primary outcome for the first 4 weeks was decrease in symptom scores. After a 3 day washout period, patients initially allocated to mosapride crossed over to placebo and vice versa for the next 4 weeks. The outcome of the second phase was maintenance of symptom control. All patients received lansoprazole (30 mg once daily) throughout study. RESULTS The decreased symptom score after 4 weeks of treatment with lansoprazole and mosapride (n = 50) was 13.42 ± 1.16 (mean ± SEM), similar to that of lansoprazole plus placebo (10.85 ± 1.03, n = 46), with an insignificant difference of 2.57 (95% CI -0.53, 5.67, P = 0.103). However, a sub-group analysis for patients with pre-treatment scores of >18 points (n = 48) revealed that lansoprazole plus mosapride achieved a greater reduction of symptom score than lansoprazole plus placebo (18.22 ± 1.91 vs. 12.88 ± 1.65; mean difference of 5.34, 95% CI 0.28, 10.40, P = 0.039). In the second phase, there was no difference between lansoprazole with mosapride or placebo in maintaining symptom control (39/44 or 86.64% vs. 41/50 or 82%, P = 0.401). Subgroup analysis for those with substantial residual symptoms revealed similar results. CONCLUSION Compared with placebo, mosapride generally does not provide additional benefit to a standard dose of lansoprazole in patients with reflux oesophagitis, except possibly in the subgroup of severely symptomatic patients.
AB - AIMS To investigate if mosapride, a prokinetic agent, was an effective adjunct to acid suppression in improving the symptoms of reflux oesophagitis. METHODS Patients (n = 96) with reflux oesophagitis were randomly assigned to either mosapride (5 mg three times daily) or placebo for 4 weeks. Symptom severity was assessed by a validated questionnaire at enrolment, 4 and 8 weeks after medication. The primary outcome for the first 4 weeks was decrease in symptom scores. After a 3 day washout period, patients initially allocated to mosapride crossed over to placebo and vice versa for the next 4 weeks. The outcome of the second phase was maintenance of symptom control. All patients received lansoprazole (30 mg once daily) throughout study. RESULTS The decreased symptom score after 4 weeks of treatment with lansoprazole and mosapride (n = 50) was 13.42 ± 1.16 (mean ± SEM), similar to that of lansoprazole plus placebo (10.85 ± 1.03, n = 46), with an insignificant difference of 2.57 (95% CI -0.53, 5.67, P = 0.103). However, a sub-group analysis for patients with pre-treatment scores of >18 points (n = 48) revealed that lansoprazole plus mosapride achieved a greater reduction of symptom score than lansoprazole plus placebo (18.22 ± 1.91 vs. 12.88 ± 1.65; mean difference of 5.34, 95% CI 0.28, 10.40, P = 0.039). In the second phase, there was no difference between lansoprazole with mosapride or placebo in maintaining symptom control (39/44 or 86.64% vs. 41/50 or 82%, P = 0.401). Subgroup analysis for those with substantial residual symptoms revealed similar results. CONCLUSION Compared with placebo, mosapride generally does not provide additional benefit to a standard dose of lansoprazole in patients with reflux oesophagitis, except possibly in the subgroup of severely symptomatic patients.
KW - gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
KW - lansoprazole
KW - mosapride
KW - reflux oesophagitis
KW - therapeutic effectiveness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954527373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954527373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03696.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03696.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20653670
AN - SCOPUS:77954527373
SN - 0306-5251
VL - 70
SP - 171
EP - 179
JO - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
JF - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
IS - 2
ER -