TY - JOUR
T1 - Modification of the superior gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of sacral sores
AU - Lin, Chin-Ta
AU - Chang, Shun-Cheng
AU - Chen, Shyi-Gen
AU - Tzeng, Yuan-Sheng
N1 - 被引用次數:1
Export Date: 21 March 2016
通訊地址: Tzeng, Y.-S.; Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Cheng-Gung Road, Taipei 11490, Taiwan; 電子郵件: [email protected]
參考文獻: Minami, R.T., Mills, R., Pardoe, R., Gluteus maximus myocutaneous flaps for repair of pressure sores (1977) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 60 (2), pp. 242-249; Parry, S.W., Mathes, S.J., Bilateral gluteus maximus myocutaneous advancement flaps: Sacral coverage for ambulatory patients (1982) Annals of Plastic Surgery, 8 (6), pp. 443-445. , DOI 10.1097/00000637-198206000-00001; Stevenson, T.R., Pollock, R.A., Rohrich, R.J., VanderKolk, C.A., The gluteus maximus musculocutaneous island flap; refinements in design and application (1987) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 79 (5), pp. 761-768. , DOI 10.1097/00006534-198705000-00015; Verpaele, A.M., Blondeel, P.N., Van Landuyt, K., Tonnard, P.L., Decordier, B., Monstrey, S.J., Matton, G., The superior gluteal artery perforator flap: An additional tool in the treatment of sacral pressure sores (1999) British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 52 (5), pp. 385-391. , DOI 10.1054/bjps.1999.3101; Koshima, I., Moriguchi, T., Soeda, S., Kawata, S., Ohta, S., Ikeda, A., The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores (1993) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 91 (4), pp. 678-683; Shea, J.D., Pressure sores: Classification and management (1975) Clin Orthop, 112, pp. 89-100; Kierney, P.C., Engrav, L.H., Isik, F.F., Esselman, P.C., Cardenas, D.D., Rand, R.P., Results of 268 pressure sores in 158 patients managed jointly by plastic surgery and rehabilitation medicine (1998) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 102 (3), pp. 765-772; Acarturk, T.O., Parsak, C.K., Sakman, G., Superior gluteal artery perforator flap in the reconstruction of pilonidal sinus (2010) J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 63, pp. 133-139; Ahmadzadeh, R., Bergeron, L., Tang, M., Morris, S.F., The superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps (2007) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120 (6), pp. 1551-1556. , DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000282098.61498.ee, PII 0000653420071100000016; Coskunfirat, O.K., Ozgentas, H.E., Gluteal perforator flaps for coverage of pressure sores at various locations (2004) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 113 (7), pp. 2012-2017. , DOI 10.1097/01.PRS.0000122215.48226.3F; Meltem, C., Esra, C., Hasan, F., Ali, D., The gluteal perforator-based flap in repair of pressure sores (2004) British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 57 (4), pp. 342-347. , DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.12.039; Lee, J.T., Hsiao, H.T., Tung, K.Y., Gluteal perforator flaps for coverage of pressure sores at various locations (2006) Plast Reconstr Surg, 117, pp. 2507-2508; Leow, M., Lim, J., Lim, T.C., The Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap for the Closure of Sacral Sores (2004) Singapore Medical Journal, 45 (1), pp. 37-39; Cheon, Y.W., Lee, M.C., Kim, Y.S., Gluteal artery perforator flap: A viable alternative for sacral radiation ulcer and osteoradionecrosis (2010) J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 63, pp. 642-647; Hurbungs, A., Ramkalawan, H., Sacral pressure sore reconstruction - The pedicled superior gluteal artery perforator flap (2012) S Afr J Surg, 50, pp. 6-8; Zeng, A., Jia, Y., Wang, X., The superior gluteal artery perforator flap for lumbosacral defect repair: A unified approach (2013) J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 66, pp. e56-e57; Moon, S.H., Choi, J.Y., Lee, J.H., Feasibility of a deepithelialized superior gluteal artery perforator propeller flap for various lumbosacral defects (2013) Ann Plast Surg, , Oct 21 [Epub ahead of print]
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Background: Despite advances in reconstruction techniques, the treatment of sacral sores remains challenging to plastic surgeons. The superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap is reliable and preserves the entire contralateral side as a future donor site. The ipsilateral gluteal muscle is preserved, and the inferior gluteal artery flaps are viable. However, dissection of the perforator is tedious and may compromise the perforator vessels. Methods: Between April 2003 and March 2013, we performed two modified flap-harvesting techniques: a rotational and a tunnel method, with only a short pedicle dissection to cover 30 sacral defects. Patient characteristics including sex, age, cause of sacral defect, flap size, perforator number, use and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: All flaps survived except two, which developed partial flap necrosis and were finally treated by contralateral V-Y advancement flap coverage. The mean follow-up period was 14.8 months (range, 3-24 months). No flap surgery-related mortality or recurrence of sacral pressure sores or infected pilonidal cysts were noted. Conclusions: Perforator-based flaps have become popular in modern reconstructive surgery because of low donor-site morbidity and good preservation of muscle. The advantages of our modification procedure include shorter operative time, lesser bleeding and lesser pedicle trauma, which make the SGAP flaps an excellent choice for sacral sore coverage. © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - Background: Despite advances in reconstruction techniques, the treatment of sacral sores remains challenging to plastic surgeons. The superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap is reliable and preserves the entire contralateral side as a future donor site. The ipsilateral gluteal muscle is preserved, and the inferior gluteal artery flaps are viable. However, dissection of the perforator is tedious and may compromise the perforator vessels. Methods: Between April 2003 and March 2013, we performed two modified flap-harvesting techniques: a rotational and a tunnel method, with only a short pedicle dissection to cover 30 sacral defects. Patient characteristics including sex, age, cause of sacral defect, flap size, perforator number, use and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: All flaps survived except two, which developed partial flap necrosis and were finally treated by contralateral V-Y advancement flap coverage. The mean follow-up period was 14.8 months (range, 3-24 months). No flap surgery-related mortality or recurrence of sacral pressure sores or infected pilonidal cysts were noted. Conclusions: Perforator-based flaps have become popular in modern reconstructive surgery because of low donor-site morbidity and good preservation of muscle. The advantages of our modification procedure include shorter operative time, lesser bleeding and lesser pedicle trauma, which make the SGAP flaps an excellent choice for sacral sore coverage. © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
KW - Reconstruction
KW - Sacral sore
KW - Superior gluteal artery perforator flap
KW - adult
KW - aged
KW - article
KW - bleeding
KW - clinical article
KW - debridement
KW - decubitus
KW - female
KW - gluteus maximus muscle
KW - graft necrosis
KW - human
KW - ipsilateral gluteal muscle
KW - island flap
KW - male
KW - middle aged
KW - operation duration
KW - plastic surgery
KW - priority journal
KW - sacrum pressure sore
KW - superior gluteal artery perforator flap
KW - surgical technique
KW - very elderly
KW - wound healing
KW - young adult
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Buttocks
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Pressure Ulcer
KW - Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
KW - Surgical Flaps
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.031
DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.031
M3 - Article
SN - 1748-6815
VL - 67
SP - 526
EP - 532
JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
IS - 4
ER -