TY - JOUR
T1 - Metaraminol use during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
T2 - a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
AU - Chao, E.
AU - Sun, H. L.
AU - Huang, S. W.
AU - Liao, J. H.
AU - Ma, P. L.
AU - Chen, H. C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Introduction: During caesarean section, the use of a vasopressor is often required to achieve haemodynamic stability of the parturient. Metaraminol is a vasopressor used in this context in some countries. However, the differences between metaraminol and other vasopressors remain unclear. Methods: A search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was performed to identify randomised controlled trials comparing the use of metaraminol with other vasopressors during spinal anaesthesia at caesarean section. The selected studies were subjected to meta-analysis and risk-of-bias assessment. Results: Four randomised, controlled trials met the selection criteria and 409 parturients who underwent an elective caesarean section were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of these trials was good. Metaraminol was associated with higher umbilical arterial pH (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.82, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.62, P=0.05); a lower incidence of fetal acidosis (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.63, P=0.02); and a lower incidence of nausea or vomiting (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.57, P=0.0005) than was ephedrine. Metaraminol resulted in higher umbilical arterial pH (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.68, P=0.002) but a higher incidence of reactive hypertension (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.46, P=0.0002) than did phenylephrine. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that for spinal anaesthesia at elective caesarean section, metaraminol may be a more suitable vasopressor than ephedrine and its effects are at least not inferior to those of phenylephrine.
AB - Introduction: During caesarean section, the use of a vasopressor is often required to achieve haemodynamic stability of the parturient. Metaraminol is a vasopressor used in this context in some countries. However, the differences between metaraminol and other vasopressors remain unclear. Methods: A search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was performed to identify randomised controlled trials comparing the use of metaraminol with other vasopressors during spinal anaesthesia at caesarean section. The selected studies were subjected to meta-analysis and risk-of-bias assessment. Results: Four randomised, controlled trials met the selection criteria and 409 parturients who underwent an elective caesarean section were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of these trials was good. Metaraminol was associated with higher umbilical arterial pH (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.82, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.62, P=0.05); a lower incidence of fetal acidosis (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.63, P=0.02); and a lower incidence of nausea or vomiting (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.57, P=0.0005) than was ephedrine. Metaraminol resulted in higher umbilical arterial pH (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.68, P=0.002) but a higher incidence of reactive hypertension (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.46, P=0.0002) than did phenylephrine. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that for spinal anaesthesia at elective caesarean section, metaraminol may be a more suitable vasopressor than ephedrine and its effects are at least not inferior to those of phenylephrine.
KW - Caesarean section
KW - Ephedrine
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Metaraminol
KW - Phenylephrine
KW - Spinal anaesthesia
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061401976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061401976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061401976
SN - 0959-289X
VL - 39
SP - 42
EP - 50
JO - International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
JF - International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
ER -