TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine learning-based brief version of the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form for preschoolers
AU - Lin, Gong Hong
AU - Lee, Shih Chieh
AU - Yu, Yen Ting
AU - Huang, Chien Yu
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science Technology, Taiwan [ 109-2636-B-214-001 , 109-2314-B-038-147 , 110-2636-B-002-023 , 110-2628-B-038-013 , and 111-2628-B-038-021 ].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: The Caregiver-Teacher Report Form of the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1½–5 (C-TRF) is a widely used checklist to identify emotional and behavioral problems in preschoolers. However, the 100-item C-TRF restricts its utility. Aims: This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based short-form of the C-TRF (C-TRF-ML). Methods and procedures: Three steps were executed. First, we split the data into three datasets in a ratio of 3:1:1 for training, validation, and cross-validation, respectively. Second, we selected a shortened item set and trained a scoring algorithm using joint learning for classification and regression using the training dataset. Then, we evaluated the similarity of scores between the C-TRF-ML and the C-TRF by r-squared and weighted kappa values using the validation dataset. Third, we cross-validated the C-TRF-ML by calculating the r-squared and weighted kappa values using the cross-validation dataset. Outcomes and results: Data of 363 children were analyzed. Thirty-six items of the C-TRF were retained. The r-squared values of C-TRF-ML scores were 0.86–0.96 in the cross-validation dataset. Weighted kappa values of the syndrome/problem grading were 0.72–0.94 in the cross-validation dataset. Conclusions and implications: The C-TRF-ML had about 60 % fewer items than the C-TRF but yielded comparable scores with the C-TRF.
AB - Background: The Caregiver-Teacher Report Form of the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1½–5 (C-TRF) is a widely used checklist to identify emotional and behavioral problems in preschoolers. However, the 100-item C-TRF restricts its utility. Aims: This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based short-form of the C-TRF (C-TRF-ML). Methods and procedures: Three steps were executed. First, we split the data into three datasets in a ratio of 3:1:1 for training, validation, and cross-validation, respectively. Second, we selected a shortened item set and trained a scoring algorithm using joint learning for classification and regression using the training dataset. Then, we evaluated the similarity of scores between the C-TRF-ML and the C-TRF by r-squared and weighted kappa values using the validation dataset. Third, we cross-validated the C-TRF-ML by calculating the r-squared and weighted kappa values using the cross-validation dataset. Outcomes and results: Data of 363 children were analyzed. Thirty-six items of the C-TRF were retained. The r-squared values of C-TRF-ML scores were 0.86–0.96 in the cross-validation dataset. Weighted kappa values of the syndrome/problem grading were 0.72–0.94 in the cross-validation dataset. Conclusions and implications: The C-TRF-ML had about 60 % fewer items than the C-TRF but yielded comparable scores with the C-TRF.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Assessment
KW - Emotional and behavioral problems
KW - Machine learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146889983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146889983&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104437
DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104437
M3 - Article
C2 - 36706597
AN - SCOPUS:85146889983
SN - 0891-4222
VL - 134
JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities
JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities
M1 - 104437
ER -