Abstract
Objectives: Docetaxel and pemetrexed have been validated as therapeutics for previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but tolerability is a concern for standard treatment with docetaxel administered once every 3 weeks (tri-weekly 75-mg/m2 schedule). We conducted this retrospective study to compare the efficacy and toxicity of weekly low-dose docetaxel versus tri-weekly pemetrexed for previously treated advanced NSCLC. Methods: Consecutive patients who received low-dose single docetaxel (30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks) at a single university-affiliated hospital following failure of previous treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Their outcomes and toxicity profiles were determined. Results: 179 patients were included between 2005 and 2008 (docetaxel, n = 79; pemetrexed, n = 100). Both groups had similar hematologic (16.5 vs. 15.0%; p = 0.84) and non-hematologic (20.3 vs. 24%; p = 0.55) toxicities. After controlling for confounding factors, docetaxel remained superior to pemetrexed for progression-free survival (median 4.0 vs. 2.4 months; hazard ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.47-0.87; p = 0.005) and overall survival (median 15.0 vs.8.5 months; hazard ratio 0.54; 95% CI 0.38-0.77; p
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 147-155 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Chemotherapy |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
- Docetaxel
- Pemetrexed
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Drug Discovery
- Pharmacology (medical)
- Infectious Diseases
- Oncology
- Pharmacology