Is 8-mm more effective than 4-mm tip electrode catheter for ablation of typical atrial flutter?

  • C. F. Tsai
  • , C. T. Tai
  • , W. C. Yu
  • , Y. J. Chen
  • , M. H. Hsieh
  • , C. E. Chiang
  • , Y. A. Ding
  • , M. S. Chang
  • , S. A. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background-The prospective, randomized study comparing 4- with 8-mm tip electrodes for radiofrequency linear ablation of typical atrial flutter is not available. Methods and Results-A total of 104 consecutive patients with typical atrial flutter were randomly assigned to undergo radiofrequency linear ablation using a 4- (Group I, n=54) or 8-mm tip electrode (Group II, n=50) catheter (temperature-control model, preset 70°C). If complete bidirectional isthmus block could not be achieved after 5 pulses, the ablation catheter was changed to the other type; the maximal radiofrequency pulse number was limited to

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)768-771
Number of pages4
JournalCirculation
Volume100
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 17 1999

Keywords

  • Ablation
  • Atrial flutter
  • Isthmus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is 8-mm more effective than 4-mm tip electrode catheter for ablation of typical atrial flutter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this