TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights about cervical lymph nodes
T2 - Evaluating deep learning–based reconstruction for head and neck computed tomography scan
AU - Lin, Yu Han
AU - Su, An Chi
AU - Ng, Shu Hang
AU - Shen, Min Ru
AU - Wu, Yu Jie
AU - Chen, Ai Chi
AU - Lee, Chia Wei
AU - Lin, Yu Chun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to investigate differences in cervical lymph node image quality on dual-energy computed tomography (CT) scan with datasets reconstructed using filter back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), and deep learning–based image reconstruction (DLIR) in patients with head and neck cancer. Method: Seventy patients with head and neck cancer underwent follow-up contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT examinations. All datasets were reconstructed using FBP, hybrid IR with 30 % adaptive statistical IR (ASiR-V), and DLIR with three selectable levels (low, medium, and high) at 2.5- and 0.625-mm slice thicknesses. Herein, signal, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio of lymph nodes and overall image quality, artifact, and noise of selected regions of interest were evaluated by two radiologists. Next, cervical lymph node sharpness was evaluated using full width at half maximum. Results: DLIR exhibited significantly reduced noise, ranging from 3.8 % to 35.9 % with improved signal-to-noise ratio (11.5–105.6 %) and contrast-to-noise ratio (10.5–107.5 %) compared with FBP and ASiR-V, for cervical lymph nodes (p < 0.001). Further, 0.625-mm-thick images reconstructed using DLIR-medium and DLIR-high had a lower noise than 2.5-mm-thick images reconstructed using FBP and ASiR-V. The lymph node margins and vessels on DLIR-medium and DLIR-high were sharper than those on FBP and ASiR-V (p < 0.05). Both readers agreed that DLIR had a better image quality than the conventional reconstruction algorithms. Conclusion: DLIR-medium and -high provided superior cervical lymph node image quality in head and neck CT. Improved image quality affords thin-slice DLIR images for dose-reduction protocols in the future.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to investigate differences in cervical lymph node image quality on dual-energy computed tomography (CT) scan with datasets reconstructed using filter back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), and deep learning–based image reconstruction (DLIR) in patients with head and neck cancer. Method: Seventy patients with head and neck cancer underwent follow-up contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT examinations. All datasets were reconstructed using FBP, hybrid IR with 30 % adaptive statistical IR (ASiR-V), and DLIR with three selectable levels (low, medium, and high) at 2.5- and 0.625-mm slice thicknesses. Herein, signal, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio of lymph nodes and overall image quality, artifact, and noise of selected regions of interest were evaluated by two radiologists. Next, cervical lymph node sharpness was evaluated using full width at half maximum. Results: DLIR exhibited significantly reduced noise, ranging from 3.8 % to 35.9 % with improved signal-to-noise ratio (11.5–105.6 %) and contrast-to-noise ratio (10.5–107.5 %) compared with FBP and ASiR-V, for cervical lymph nodes (p < 0.001). Further, 0.625-mm-thick images reconstructed using DLIR-medium and DLIR-high had a lower noise than 2.5-mm-thick images reconstructed using FBP and ASiR-V. The lymph node margins and vessels on DLIR-medium and DLIR-high were sharper than those on FBP and ASiR-V (p < 0.05). Both readers agreed that DLIR had a better image quality than the conventional reconstruction algorithms. Conclusion: DLIR-medium and -high provided superior cervical lymph node image quality in head and neck CT. Improved image quality affords thin-slice DLIR images for dose-reduction protocols in the future.
KW - Computer-assisted
KW - Deep learning
KW - Head and neck neoplasms
KW - Image enhancement
KW - Image processing
KW - Lymph nodes
KW - Multidetector computed tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175320254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85175320254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100534
DO - 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100534
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175320254
SN - 2352-0477
VL - 12
JO - European Journal of Radiology Open
JF - European Journal of Radiology Open
M1 - 100534
ER -