TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved performance of new prenotification criteria for acute stroke patients
AU - Hsieh, Ming Ju
AU - Tang, Sung Chun
AU - Ko, Patrick Chow In
AU - Chiang, Wen Chu
AU - Tsai, Li Kai
AU - Chang, Anna Marie
AU - Wang, An Yi
AU - Yeh, Shin Joe
AU - Huang, Kuang Yu
AU - Jeng, Jiann Shing
AU - Ma, Matthew Huei Ming
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Formosan Medical Association.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Background/purpose: We aim to evaluate the accuracy of the new prehospital notification criteria for patients with potential acute stroke in the prehospital setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study from March 2011 to February 2013 of potential acute stroke patients prenotified using the new criteria which were: (1) positive Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS); (2) symptom onset within 3 hours; and (3) blood glucose level > 60 mg/dL. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the new criteria were calculated and outcomes of acute stroke patients were reported. Data of all patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) transported to the destination hospital were also obtained to evaluate the compliance of emergency medical technicians. Results: There were 2888 patients suspected of stroke by emergency medical technicians and 221 patients prenotified due to meeting the criteria. The PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity of the new criteria were 76.9%, 96.6%, 64.9%, and 98.1%, respectively. Onset time > 3 hours (24/51, 47.1%) and seizure (27.5%) were the two most common conditions leading to false prenotification. Of all prenotified patients, 23.1% (51/221) received thrombolytic therapy. Hemorrhagic stroke or ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic transformation (53.8%) and minor symptoms or rapid recovery (26.9%) were the most common reasons excluding correctly prenotified patients from thrombolytic therapy. Conclusion: The accuracy of the new prehospital stroke criteria has higher PPV and specificity compared to previous CPSS validation studies.
AB - Background/purpose: We aim to evaluate the accuracy of the new prehospital notification criteria for patients with potential acute stroke in the prehospital setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study from March 2011 to February 2013 of potential acute stroke patients prenotified using the new criteria which were: (1) positive Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS); (2) symptom onset within 3 hours; and (3) blood glucose level > 60 mg/dL. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the new criteria were calculated and outcomes of acute stroke patients were reported. Data of all patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) transported to the destination hospital were also obtained to evaluate the compliance of emergency medical technicians. Results: There were 2888 patients suspected of stroke by emergency medical technicians and 221 patients prenotified due to meeting the criteria. The PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity of the new criteria were 76.9%, 96.6%, 64.9%, and 98.1%, respectively. Onset time > 3 hours (24/51, 47.1%) and seizure (27.5%) were the two most common conditions leading to false prenotification. Of all prenotified patients, 23.1% (51/221) received thrombolytic therapy. Hemorrhagic stroke or ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic transformation (53.8%) and minor symptoms or rapid recovery (26.9%) were the most common reasons excluding correctly prenotified patients from thrombolytic therapy. Conclusion: The accuracy of the new prehospital stroke criteria has higher PPV and specificity compared to previous CPSS validation studies.
KW - Emergency medical services
KW - Prehospital stroke scale
KW - Prenotification
KW - Sensitivity and specificity
KW - Stroke care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927584171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927584171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.03.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.03.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 25886861
AN - SCOPUS:84927584171
SN - 0929-6646
VL - 115
SP - 257
EP - 262
JO - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
IS - 4
ER -