How to define obesity? Evidence-based multiple action points for public awareness, screening, and treatment: An extension of Asian-Pacific recommendations

Wen Harn Pan, Wen Ting Yeh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

320 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Metabolic risks are greater in Asians than Caucasians at a given body mass index (BMI). It is generally accepted that the BMI cut-off points for defining overweight and obesity should be lower for Asians. However, the percent body fat at a given BMI and metabolic responses to fatness vary among the different ethnic groups in Asia. Therefore, roughly even-spaced multiple action points (i.e., BMIs of 23, 25, 27.5, 30, 32.5, 35 and 37.5) have been advocated for managing obesity in Asians. We propose here evidence-based ethnicity-specific action points for public awareness, screening, and treatment that take into consideration sensitivity, specificity, and positive/ negative predictive values for cardiovascular disease and/or metabolic syndromes, which are the most prevalent adverse consequences of obesity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)370-374
Number of pages5
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume17
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Body mass index
  • Evidence-based
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Obesity definition
  • Waist circumference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to define obesity? Evidence-based multiple action points for public awareness, screening, and treatment: An extension of Asian-Pacific recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this