TY - JOUR
T1 - Higher incidence of major complications after splenic embolization for blunt splenic injuries in elderly patients
AU - Wu, Shih Chi
AU - Fu, Chih Yuan
AU - Chen, Ray Jade
AU - Chen, Yung Fang
AU - Wang, Yu-Chun
AU - Chung, Ping Kuei
AU - Yu, Shu Fen
AU - Tung, Cheng Cheng
AU - Lee, Kun Hua
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - Background: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries has been widely accepted, and the application of splenic artery embolization (SAE) has become an effective adjunct to NOM. However, complications do occur after SAE. In this study, we assess the factors leading to the major complications associated with SAE. Materials and Methods: Focusing on the major complications after SAE, we retrospectively studied patients who received SAE and were admitted to 2 major referral trauma centers under the same established algorithm for management of blunt splenic injuries. The demographics, angiographic findings, and factors for major complications after SAE were examined. Major complications were considered to be direct adverse effects arising from SAE that were potentially fatal or were capable of causing disability. Results: There were a total of 261 patients with blunt splenic injuries in this study. Of the 261 patients, 53 underwent SAE, 11 (21%) of whom were noted to have 12 major complications: 8 cases of postprocedural bleeding, 2 cases of total infarction, 1 case of splenic abscess, and 1 case of splenic atrophy. Patients older than 65 years were more susceptible to major complications after SAE. Conclusion: Splenic artery embolization is considered an effective adjunct to NOM in patients with blunt splenic injuries. However, risks of major complications do exist, and being elderly is, in part, associated with a higher major complication incidence.
AB - Background: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries has been widely accepted, and the application of splenic artery embolization (SAE) has become an effective adjunct to NOM. However, complications do occur after SAE. In this study, we assess the factors leading to the major complications associated with SAE. Materials and Methods: Focusing on the major complications after SAE, we retrospectively studied patients who received SAE and were admitted to 2 major referral trauma centers under the same established algorithm for management of blunt splenic injuries. The demographics, angiographic findings, and factors for major complications after SAE were examined. Major complications were considered to be direct adverse effects arising from SAE that were potentially fatal or were capable of causing disability. Results: There were a total of 261 patients with blunt splenic injuries in this study. Of the 261 patients, 53 underwent SAE, 11 (21%) of whom were noted to have 12 major complications: 8 cases of postprocedural bleeding, 2 cases of total infarction, 1 case of splenic abscess, and 1 case of splenic atrophy. Patients older than 65 years were more susceptible to major complications after SAE. Conclusion: Splenic artery embolization is considered an effective adjunct to NOM in patients with blunt splenic injuries. However, risks of major complications do exist, and being elderly is, in part, associated with a higher major complication incidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751671810&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751671810&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.07.026
DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.07.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 20825777
AN - SCOPUS:78751671810
SN - 0735-6757
VL - 29
SP - 135
EP - 140
JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 2
ER -