TY - JOUR
T1 - Hepatocellular carcinoma risk prediction model for the general population
T2 - The predictive power of transaminases
AU - Wen, Chi Pang
AU - Lin, Jie
AU - Yang, Yi Chen
AU - Tsai, Min Kuang
AU - Tsao, Chwen Keng
AU - Etzel, Carol
AU - Huang, Maosheng
AU - Hsu, Chung Yi
AU - Ye, Yuanqing
AU - Mishra, Lopa
AU - Hawk, Ernest
AU - Wu, Xifeng
PY - 2012/10/17
Y1 - 2012/10/17
N2 - Background Risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma are available for individuals with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections who are at high risk but not for the general population with average or unknown risk. We developed five simple risk prediction models based on clinically available data from the general population. Methods A prospective cohort of 428 584 subjects from a private health screening firm in Taiwan was divided into two subgroups-one with known HCV test results (n = 130 533 subjects) and the other without (n = 298 051 subjects). A total of 1668 incident hepatocellular carcinomas occurred during an average follow-up of 8.5 years. Model inputs included age, sex, health history-related variables; HBV or HCV infection-related variables; serum levels of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and alfa-fetoprotein (AFP), as well as other variables of routine blood panels for liver function. Cox proportional hazards regression method was used to identify risk predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess discriminatory accuracy of the models. Models were internally validated. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Age, sex, health history, HBV and HCV status, and serum ALT, AST, AFP levels were statistically significant independent predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma risk (all P <. 05). Use of serum transaminases only in a model showed a higher discrimination compared with HBV or HCV only (for transaminases, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.912, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.909 to 0.915; for HBV, AUC = 0.840, 95% CI = 0.833 to 0.848; and for HCV, AUC = 0.841, 95% CI = 0.834 to 0.847). Adding HBV and HCV data to the transaminase-only model improved the discrimination (AUC = 0.933, 95% CI = 0.929 to 0.949). Internal validation showed high discriminatory accuracy and calibration of these models. Conclusion Models with transaminase data were best able to predict hepatocellular carcinoma risk even among subjects with unknown or HBV-or HCV-negative infection status.
AB - Background Risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma are available for individuals with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections who are at high risk but not for the general population with average or unknown risk. We developed five simple risk prediction models based on clinically available data from the general population. Methods A prospective cohort of 428 584 subjects from a private health screening firm in Taiwan was divided into two subgroups-one with known HCV test results (n = 130 533 subjects) and the other without (n = 298 051 subjects). A total of 1668 incident hepatocellular carcinomas occurred during an average follow-up of 8.5 years. Model inputs included age, sex, health history-related variables; HBV or HCV infection-related variables; serum levels of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and alfa-fetoprotein (AFP), as well as other variables of routine blood panels for liver function. Cox proportional hazards regression method was used to identify risk predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess discriminatory accuracy of the models. Models were internally validated. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Age, sex, health history, HBV and HCV status, and serum ALT, AST, AFP levels were statistically significant independent predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma risk (all P <. 05). Use of serum transaminases only in a model showed a higher discrimination compared with HBV or HCV only (for transaminases, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.912, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.909 to 0.915; for HBV, AUC = 0.840, 95% CI = 0.833 to 0.848; and for HCV, AUC = 0.841, 95% CI = 0.834 to 0.847). Adding HBV and HCV data to the transaminase-only model improved the discrimination (AUC = 0.933, 95% CI = 0.929 to 0.949). Internal validation showed high discriminatory accuracy and calibration of these models. Conclusion Models with transaminase data were best able to predict hepatocellular carcinoma risk even among subjects with unknown or HBV-or HCV-negative infection status.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867728046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867728046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djs372
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djs372
M3 - Article
C2 - 23073549
AN - SCOPUS:84867728046
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 104
SP - 1599
EP - 1611
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 20
ER -