11 Citations (Scopus)


Background/purpose: This study investigated in seven patients the main causes of accidental fractures of various implant components. Materials and methods: We used a scanning electron microscope and transmission electron microscope to observe the fracture interfaces of four fixtures, six abutment screws, and nine gold screws retrieved from patients with prosthetic problems. Results: In all fixtures and some abutment screws, parafunctional force and a cantilever design ultimately resulted in movement of low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) at most fracture surfaces. Fractographic observations showed that overloading deformed the grain sizes, and the no precipitates were present on the high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) or matrices of some abutment screws and most gold screws. Conclusion: To avoid implant fracture, certain underlying mechanical risk factors should be noted such as patients with a habit of bruxism, bridgework with a cantilever design, or two implants installed in a line in the posterior mandible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-14
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Dental Sciences
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013


  • HAGB
  • LAGB
  • dental implant
  • fatigue fracture
  • fractography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Dentistry


Dive into the research topics of 'Fractographic analysis of fractured dental implant components'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this