TY - JOUR
T1 - Fractional CO2 laser vs. Fraxel laser for lower eyelid rejuvenation following transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty
AU - Wang, Yen Po
AU - Hsiao, Yen Chang
AU - Chang, Cheng Jen
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by research grants awarded of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CMRP 821, CMRPG3E0581). Additional institutional support was received from the National Science Council (NMRPG9002: NSC 89-2314-B-182A-150), Taiwan.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Aim: Transconjunctival CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty is considered to be a safe and reliable approach. A retrospective review of transconjunctival approached CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty associated with fractional CO2 laser ablation or fractioned non-ablative Fraxel laser resurfacing for lower eyelid rejuvenation is presented for comparison. Methods: From February 1996 to February 2016, 250 patients underwent CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty with a male to female ratio of 1:7.5. The age ranged from 43 to 68 years (mean 52 years). A CO2 laser was applied to make a transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty. Immediately after CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty, 40 patients received fractional CO2 laser and 40 patients took Fraxel laser for resurfacing. Results: Swelling occurred in all patients postoperatively. Complications related to transconjunctival CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty were 6 (2.4%) patients with conjunctival chemosis, 5 (2.0%) with ecchymosis, and 3 (1.2%) with granulomas. The early complications (≤ 1 month) related to fractional CO2 laser ablation were 40 (100%) patients with mild erythema, 40 (100%) with mild edema, 1 (2.5%) with hyperpigmentation, 1 (2.5%) with infection, and 1 (2.5%) with scarring. These problems resolved in all patients after 3 months. There was no complication after Fraxel laser right after lower blepharoplasty. The Fraxel group had short recovery time. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in final outcome (≥ 6 months). Conclusion: Transconjunctival CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty associated with fractional CO2 laser ablation or Fraxel laser resurfacing assisted the appearance around the periorbital regions.
AB - Aim: Transconjunctival CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty is considered to be a safe and reliable approach. A retrospective review of transconjunctival approached CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty associated with fractional CO2 laser ablation or fractioned non-ablative Fraxel laser resurfacing for lower eyelid rejuvenation is presented for comparison. Methods: From February 1996 to February 2016, 250 patients underwent CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty with a male to female ratio of 1:7.5. The age ranged from 43 to 68 years (mean 52 years). A CO2 laser was applied to make a transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty. Immediately after CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty, 40 patients received fractional CO2 laser and 40 patients took Fraxel laser for resurfacing. Results: Swelling occurred in all patients postoperatively. Complications related to transconjunctival CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty were 6 (2.4%) patients with conjunctival chemosis, 5 (2.0%) with ecchymosis, and 3 (1.2%) with granulomas. The early complications (≤ 1 month) related to fractional CO2 laser ablation were 40 (100%) patients with mild erythema, 40 (100%) with mild edema, 1 (2.5%) with hyperpigmentation, 1 (2.5%) with infection, and 1 (2.5%) with scarring. These problems resolved in all patients after 3 months. There was no complication after Fraxel laser right after lower blepharoplasty. The Fraxel group had short recovery time. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in final outcome (≥ 6 months). Conclusion: Transconjunctival CO2 laser lower blepharoplasty associated with fractional CO2 laser ablation or Fraxel laser resurfacing assisted the appearance around the periorbital regions.
KW - ablative resurfacing
KW - fractional CO laser
KW - Fraxel laser
KW - Transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149940360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85149940360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20517/2347-9264.2021.17
DO - 10.20517/2347-9264.2021.17
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149940360
SN - 2347-9264
VL - 8
JO - Plastic and Aesthetic Research
JF - Plastic and Aesthetic Research
M1 - 8
ER -