TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of prognostic factors and the role of chemotherapy in unfavorable carcinoma of unknown primary site
T2 - A 10-year cohort study
AU - Chen, Kuo Wei
AU - Liu, Chia Jen
AU - Lu, Hsueh Ju
AU - Tzeng, Cheng Hwai
AU - Liu, Jin Hwang
AU - Chiou, Tzeon Jye
AU - Yen, Chueh Chuan
AU - Wang, Wei Shu
AU - Chao, Ta Chung
AU - Teng, Hao Wei
AU - Chen, Ming Huang
AU - Liu, Chun Yu
AU - Chang, Peter Mu Hsin
AU - Yang, Muh Hwa
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Background: Carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) has a poor prognosis and the prognostic factors in these patients are not well established. Furthermore, there are no selection criteria for patients who should benefit from chemotherapy. Methods. The medical records of 179 CUP patients who were treated at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Factors associated with survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences between the groups with and without palliative chemotherapy were analyzed. Results: Univariate analysis revealed multiple prognostic factors, including performance status, lung metastasis, number of metastatic organs, serum albumin, corrected serum calcium, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), sodium, and cholesterol levels, palliative chemotherapy, and white blood cell and lymphocyte counts. Multivariate analysis showed that performance status < 2, serum albumin level 3.5 g/dl, corrected serum calcium level < 10.7 mg/dl, single metastatic organ, and palliative chemotherapy were independent factors of better prognosis. Patients with better performance status, higher serum albumin, and lower serum LDH levels had significantly greater benefit from palliative chemotherapy. Conclusions: Certain patients with unfavorable CUP will have better survival. Identification of patients with unfavorable CUP who could benefit from palliative chemotherapy warrants future prospective studies.
AB - Background: Carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) has a poor prognosis and the prognostic factors in these patients are not well established. Furthermore, there are no selection criteria for patients who should benefit from chemotherapy. Methods. The medical records of 179 CUP patients who were treated at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Factors associated with survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences between the groups with and without palliative chemotherapy were analyzed. Results: Univariate analysis revealed multiple prognostic factors, including performance status, lung metastasis, number of metastatic organs, serum albumin, corrected serum calcium, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), sodium, and cholesterol levels, palliative chemotherapy, and white blood cell and lymphocyte counts. Multivariate analysis showed that performance status < 2, serum albumin level 3.5 g/dl, corrected serum calcium level < 10.7 mg/dl, single metastatic organ, and palliative chemotherapy were independent factors of better prognosis. Patients with better performance status, higher serum albumin, and lower serum LDH levels had significantly greater benefit from palliative chemotherapy. Conclusions: Certain patients with unfavorable CUP will have better survival. Identification of patients with unfavorable CUP who could benefit from palliative chemotherapy warrants future prospective studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862803532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862803532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1756-0500-5-70
DO - 10.1186/1756-0500-5-70
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22280526
AN - SCOPUS:84862803532
SN - 1756-0500
VL - 5
JO - BMC Research Notes
JF - BMC Research Notes
M1 - 70
ER -