TY - JOUR
T1 - Emission characteristics and cytotoxic effects of PM2.5 from residential semi-coke briquette combustion
AU - Niu, Xinyi
AU - Tian, Jie
AU - Han, Yongming
AU - Chuang, Hsiao Chi
AU - Sun, Jian
AU - Shen, Zhenxing
AU - Cao, Junji
AU - Li, Xuxiang
AU - Ho, Kin Fai
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation ( 2021M702589 and 2021M692549 ), the Basic Scientific Research Foundation of Xi’an Jiaotong University (xjh 012020024), the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 41991250 ) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2022JQ-270).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - Coal combustion emits large amounts of PM2.5 (particulate matter with a diameter of ≤ 2.5 μm), and the emissions from different coal types differ. Clean fuels are essential in reducing PM2.5 emissions and their respiratory effects on human. This study compared PM2.5 emissions and their chemical components from four types of coal (i.e., bituminous raw-coal chunk, semi-coke briquette, anthracite, and bituminous briquette). The bioreactivies triggered by PM2.5 exposure to human alveolar epithelial (A549) cells were compared, and the emission factors (EFs) of bioreactivies were calculated. The PM2.5 EFs of semi-coke briquettes were reduced efficiently compared with those of raw-coal chunk, and their chemical profiles also differed. The contribution of total carbon and metals (i.e., S, Cl, Zn, and Pb) was higher for semi-coke briquette relative to raw-coal chunk, which may be due to the concentration effect of the semi-coke briquette preparation process. The production of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) was higher for semi-coke briquette relative to raw-coal chunk at the PM2.5 exposure dose of 100 μg mL−1. The EFs of LDH and ROS for semi-coke briquette, anthracite, and bituminous briquette were substantially lower than those for raw-coal chunk, which verified the effects of clean coal on oxidative stress and cytotoxicity. Organic carbon and specific heavy metals (i.e., Cu, Fe, Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr) were significantly correlated with cell membrane damage and oxidative stress. This study clarifies potential adverse effects of PM2.5 emissions from the combustion of various coal types and highlights the necessity of adopting clean coal to reduce PM2.5 emissions and cytotoxicity.
AB - Coal combustion emits large amounts of PM2.5 (particulate matter with a diameter of ≤ 2.5 μm), and the emissions from different coal types differ. Clean fuels are essential in reducing PM2.5 emissions and their respiratory effects on human. This study compared PM2.5 emissions and their chemical components from four types of coal (i.e., bituminous raw-coal chunk, semi-coke briquette, anthracite, and bituminous briquette). The bioreactivies triggered by PM2.5 exposure to human alveolar epithelial (A549) cells were compared, and the emission factors (EFs) of bioreactivies were calculated. The PM2.5 EFs of semi-coke briquettes were reduced efficiently compared with those of raw-coal chunk, and their chemical profiles also differed. The contribution of total carbon and metals (i.e., S, Cl, Zn, and Pb) was higher for semi-coke briquette relative to raw-coal chunk, which may be due to the concentration effect of the semi-coke briquette preparation process. The production of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) was higher for semi-coke briquette relative to raw-coal chunk at the PM2.5 exposure dose of 100 μg mL−1. The EFs of LDH and ROS for semi-coke briquette, anthracite, and bituminous briquette were substantially lower than those for raw-coal chunk, which verified the effects of clean coal on oxidative stress and cytotoxicity. Organic carbon and specific heavy metals (i.e., Cu, Fe, Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr) were significantly correlated with cell membrane damage and oxidative stress. This study clarifies potential adverse effects of PM2.5 emissions from the combustion of various coal types and highlights the necessity of adopting clean coal to reduce PM2.5 emissions and cytotoxicity.
KW - Household coal combustion
KW - Oxidative stress
KW - PM
KW - Respiratory health effects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127183556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127183556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123998
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123998
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127183556
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 321
JO - Fuel
JF - Fuel
M1 - 123998
ER -