TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of adhesive strategies for restorative dentistry
T2 - A systematic review and network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials over 12 months of follow-up
AU - Ma, Kevin Sheng Kai
AU - Wang, Li Tzu
AU - Blatz, Markus B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by funding from the Taiwan Ministry of Science & Technology (MOST: 108-2813-C-040-040-B to K.S.M. & 109-2326-B-002-016-MY3 to L.T.W.), and a research grant from International Team for Implantology (fund no. 1577_2021 to K.S.M.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Japan Prosthodontic Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Purpose: The efficacy of etch-and-rinse, selective enamel-etching, and self-etching protocols for universal adhesives in follow-ups of over 12 months was compared in a network meta-analysis. Study selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 1998 to 2022 that compared marginal staining, marginal adaptation, retention and fractures, post-operative sensitivity, or recurrence of caries that took place over 12-months post-restoration were selected. A network meta-analysis determined the performance of each adhesive protocol. Results: After screening 981 articles, 16 RCTs were subjected to data extraction. Of which, 674 patients with 2816 restorations, were included in the network meta-analysis. The pooled risk of marginal discoloration following self-etching was significantly higher than that following etch-and-rinse at over 12, 24, and 36 months, which was time-dependent. The pooled risks of unfavorable marginal adaptation and unfavorable retention and fractures following self-etching were also significantly higher than that following etch-and-rinse, with the rates of unfavorable retention and fractures in non-carious cervical lesions increasing in a time-dependent manner. The pooled risks of marginal discoloration, unfavorable marginal adaptation, retention and fractures were similar between etch-and-rinse and selective enamel-etching protocols. Post-operative hypersensitivity and recurrence of caries were not significantly different among etch-and-rinse, selective enamel-etching, and self-etching protocols. Conclusions: In follow-ups over 12 months, esthetic and functional outcomes of restorations completed with an etch-and-rinse adhesive protocol were superior to the ones achieved with a self-etching strategy without selective enamel-etching. Selective enamel etching is recommended for self-etching systems. Biological responses were similar for all three adhesive strategies.
AB - Purpose: The efficacy of etch-and-rinse, selective enamel-etching, and self-etching protocols for universal adhesives in follow-ups of over 12 months was compared in a network meta-analysis. Study selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 1998 to 2022 that compared marginal staining, marginal adaptation, retention and fractures, post-operative sensitivity, or recurrence of caries that took place over 12-months post-restoration were selected. A network meta-analysis determined the performance of each adhesive protocol. Results: After screening 981 articles, 16 RCTs were subjected to data extraction. Of which, 674 patients with 2816 restorations, were included in the network meta-analysis. The pooled risk of marginal discoloration following self-etching was significantly higher than that following etch-and-rinse at over 12, 24, and 36 months, which was time-dependent. The pooled risks of unfavorable marginal adaptation and unfavorable retention and fractures following self-etching were also significantly higher than that following etch-and-rinse, with the rates of unfavorable retention and fractures in non-carious cervical lesions increasing in a time-dependent manner. The pooled risks of marginal discoloration, unfavorable marginal adaptation, retention and fractures were similar between etch-and-rinse and selective enamel-etching protocols. Post-operative hypersensitivity and recurrence of caries were not significantly different among etch-and-rinse, selective enamel-etching, and self-etching protocols. Conclusions: In follow-ups over 12 months, esthetic and functional outcomes of restorations completed with an etch-and-rinse adhesive protocol were superior to the ones achieved with a self-etching strategy without selective enamel-etching. Selective enamel etching is recommended for self-etching systems. Biological responses were similar for all three adhesive strategies.
KW - Adhesive strategies
KW - Double-blind randomized controlled trials
KW - Network meta-analysis
KW - Restorative dentistry
KW - Universal adhesives
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145979471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85145979471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00279
DO - 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00279
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35691823
AN - SCOPUS:85145979471
SN - 1883-1958
VL - 67
SP - 35
EP - 44
JO - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
JF - Journal of Prosthodontic Research
IS - 1
ER -