Effects of teriparatide and bisphosphonate on spinal fusion procedure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Shih Hao Cheng, Yi Jie Kuo, Chiehfeng Chen, Yi No Kang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Giving patients anti-osteoporotic agents peri-operatively is a well-accepted strategy to increase fusion rate and prevent complications. The purpose of this study was to investigate effectiveness of teriparatide and bisphosphonate on fusion surgery of thoracic and lumbar spine. Methods We searched EMBASE and PubMed for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies using teriparatide or bisphosphonate in peri-operative spinal fusion surgery. Our synthesized data of fusion rate, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and adverse event in contrast-based network meta-analysis. Pooled results were presented in risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Our search hit eight RCTs and three prospective studies with 676 patients receiving spinal surgery. Pooled result showed that teriparatide+Denosumab leads to significantly higher fusion rate than placebo (RR, 2.84; 95% CI: 1.22 to 6.60) and bisphosphonate (RR, 2.59; 95% CI: 1.13 to 5.96). We did not observe significant finding among placebo, teriparatide, and bisphosphonate in the two network models. Conclusion This is the first network meta-analysis providing an overview of the use of teriparatide and bisphosphonate for spinal fusion surgery. Teriparatide treatments are worth to be consider for spinal fusion surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0237566
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume15
Issue number9 September
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of teriparatide and bisphosphonate on spinal fusion procedure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this