TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation program on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
T2 - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU - Su, Chien Ling
AU - Tam, Ka Wai
AU - Fang, Tien Pei
AU - Chiang, Ling Ling
AU - Chen, Hui Chin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021-IOS Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - BACKGROUND: Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) develop respiratory failure and progressive muscle weakness. The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on the lung function of patients with ALS are unclear. OBJECTIVE: Through this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we evaluated the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation, such as type of treatment, on patients with ALS and compared the effectiveness of this treatment. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched until December 2020. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the updated Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). Data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England), and the meta-analysis was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Of 2168 articles, 10 trials were reviewed; among these trials, two focused on respiratory training and eight on physical exercise, three of which involved a combination of aerobic and resistance training. Our meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in the ALSFRS-R score and % FVC among patients with ALS. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory training or physical exercise did not significantly affect the ALSFRS-R score and % FVC of patients with ALS. At 12 months after intervention, the ALSFRS-R score in the physical exercise group was higher than that in the usual care group. Further clinical trials are warranted to develop approaches for improving the lung function of patients with ALS.
AB - BACKGROUND: Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) develop respiratory failure and progressive muscle weakness. The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on the lung function of patients with ALS are unclear. OBJECTIVE: Through this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we evaluated the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation, such as type of treatment, on patients with ALS and compared the effectiveness of this treatment. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched until December 2020. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the updated Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). Data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England), and the meta-analysis was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Of 2168 articles, 10 trials were reviewed; among these trials, two focused on respiratory training and eight on physical exercise, three of which involved a combination of aerobic and resistance training. Our meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in the ALSFRS-R score and % FVC among patients with ALS. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory training or physical exercise did not significantly affect the ALSFRS-R score and % FVC of patients with ALS. At 12 months after intervention, the ALSFRS-R score in the physical exercise group was higher than that in the usual care group. Further clinical trials are warranted to develop approaches for improving the lung function of patients with ALS.
KW - amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
KW - physical exercise
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - respiratory training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105480240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105480240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/NRE-210052
DO - 10.3233/NRE-210052
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33814477
AN - SCOPUS:85105480240
SN - 1053-8135
VL - 48
SP - 255
EP - 265
JO - NeuroRehabilitation
JF - NeuroRehabilitation
IS - 3
ER -