TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in knee osteoarthritis
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials
AU - Wu, Ssu Hsuan
AU - Lin, Chueh Ho
AU - Hsu, Tzu Yun
AU - Liou, Tsan Hon
AU - Escorpizo, Reuben
AU - Chen, Hung Chou
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective Assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods Searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases until August 3, 2023, and identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of tDCS in knee OA whose outcomes using pain scores or functional scales. The selected RCTs were subjected to meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Results Seven RCTs involving 488 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, the tDCS group exhibited significant improvement in pain scores after treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70 to 1.35; n = 359; I2 = 46%), pain scores during follow-up (SMD = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.45; n = 358; I2 = 86%), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores after treatment (SMD = 4.76; 95% CI: 0.16 to 9.53; n = 319; I2 = 74%), but WOMAC scores during follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (SMD = 0.06; 95% CI: -0.2 to 0.32; n = 225; I2 = 0%). Conclusion tDCS is a promising therapy for knee OA. Further investigation using large-scale, high-quality RCTs is necessary for optimal tDCS approach in knee OA.
AB - Objective Assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods Searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases until August 3, 2023, and identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of tDCS in knee OA whose outcomes using pain scores or functional scales. The selected RCTs were subjected to meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Results Seven RCTs involving 488 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, the tDCS group exhibited significant improvement in pain scores after treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70 to 1.35; n = 359; I2 = 46%), pain scores during follow-up (SMD = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.21 to 1.45; n = 358; I2 = 86%), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores after treatment (SMD = 4.76; 95% CI: 0.16 to 9.53; n = 319; I2 = 74%), but WOMAC scores during follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (SMD = 0.06; 95% CI: -0.2 to 0.32; n = 225; I2 = 0%). Conclusion tDCS is a promising therapy for knee OA. Further investigation using large-scale, high-quality RCTs is necessary for optimal tDCS approach in knee OA.
KW - Knee osteoarthritis
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Systematic review
KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199095667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85199095667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002530
DO - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002530
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85199095667
SN - 0894-9115
JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ER -